Custom Cube!!: Recent Activity
| Custom Cube!!: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Skeleton |
Recent updates to Custom Cube!!: (Generated at 2025-05-03 00:26:46)
| Custom Cube!!: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Skeleton |
Recent updates to Custom Cube!!: (Generated at 2025-05-03 00:26:46)
what do you mean?
good catch. thanks
Hmm... do you think I should remove the intimidate? or replace it with something else? i'm trying to keep it as
for a cycle
Do you think I could push the cost more to make it more appealing?
Aw man. I didn't know those existed. Sigh.
Hey! Cool.
I can assure you these work wonderful.
It feels strange that a card fuels itself but in the wrong order. Have you considered this template?
Put the top three cards of you library into your graveyard. Then return a card from your graveyard to your hand.
Also, black shouldn't Regrowth.
I'm not sure this is cool. Changing the targets is normally a given for these effects.
The target varying doesn't get along with counting something very well. At best, you can try "where X is the number of creatures you control as you cast CARDNAME", but that's a weird template, because most cards that count your creatures do so on resultion.
This is an elegant card, with those costs and all.
WHAT? Take it easy on the mana cost. Try
at least if you want it very strong.
First, congratulations on inventing 'Inverse Modular'. That's a pretty cool ability.
But I got to agree with Umbreon... this is pretty damn crazy. I'd pay
to get this creature without the Intimidate in most cube drafts. And while I think it's unlikely to happen, I got to admit that the combination of this card with something like Shivan Meteor is a spectacular way to clear your opponent's board.
"...of that player's choice", right?
I think this is a little too clever for its own good. :/ Not sure if others feel the same.
I like the phras "with the same controller". I'm not 100% if it's been used before, though.
I don't like that this is easy recursion if you have an empty or mostly empty graveyard.
Very good design. :)
Insane. Compare to Electrolyze or Solar Blast.
Compare to Goblin Cohort. This is very weak.
Unless you like Hymn to Tourach, I can testify that this kind of effects, while obvious, create feel-bad moments for both sides.
I've always wanted a
2/2 intimidate.
On the other hand, wow, is that ability strong. o.O But aside from that, I'm worried people will think that if you Lightning Bolt this it will only receive 2 damage.
Rules tip: When you have an optional effect, and it isn't kicker or a modal spell like Piracy Charm, try not to make new targets. This is because kicker and modal spells specifically remove the text from the spell if you're not choosing that, but others don't have that luxury.
This means that this spell will always need to target a spell and a creature. You couldn't cast it on an empty board.
In this case, because the regular effect has a target, you could use the ugly "up to one target" to try to solve the issue.
I find "enters the battlefield or attacks" to be an epic wording because I associate it with M11's titans, and I would just use that line if I am referencing them. Here, it seems awfully mundane.
It's a feel thing, and it's a small thing, but I'm sure I'm not the only one who thinks this way.
This sounds black to me. :)
Don't confuse "This is complicated but worth it because it leads to interesting decisions" to "This is strange so sometime people will mess it up". The first is a fun kind of complication and the second one isn't.
I'm not saying you should change this. Just keep it in mind.
Yes. You can have the first strike be activated, too, or you could try to get away with it like Thalia, Guardian of Thraben did (although she's legendary). But in any case, try to go back with the wording. The new one's much more strange.