Ulaqat: Recent Activity
| Ulaqat: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Skeleton | Ulaqat Map | Cards that actually have a flavor reference |
Recent updates to Ulaqat: (Generated at 2025-11-03 23:13:10)
Take on Anger of the Gods
Hmm, this now looks very similar to Reality Shift. This isn't critique - just an observation.
Switched to instant and reduced cmc by 1. Token reduced from 3/3 to 2/2
Pongify had the problem that it used "destroy" rather than "exile" - thematically an ill fit; the card has been remade as Rapid Hybridization, because the concept is fine though. Maybe a single mana instant is a little bit too good for what you are planning, but adding
to the cost and making it a sorcery? That's a bit much.
Creature types are capitalized: "3/3 blue Fish creature token".
Also something went wrong in the making of that eminder text, like two sentences being mangled into one.
Now a 3/3 fish
I wasn't sure how blue was doing baleful polymorph spells nowadays. I went off Curse of the Swine. Yeah, 3 is fine with me. Big for a fish, but hey that's why you jank it up with Ringed Seal.
This reminds me of Afterlife and somewhat of Mercy Killing.
The token should at least be a 2/2 IMO. MaRo would agree.
Maybe two 1/1s? I don't know how any of these changes would fit with the flavor.
xD I just thought up a card idea inspired by the flavor:
> Back to School
> Instant
> Exile target creature, then its controller creates X 1/1 blue Fish creature tokens, where X is that creature's power (CMC?).
Was almost a Cat, but then I switched to Fox instead. I picked a random word to tack on to fox because I didn't have anything that made sense (nor did I when it was a lynx).
An item used by Eo Jax, Cryo Champion. I considered using a real-world sword type for a more descriptive name, but since I wanted to avoid real-world parallels on Quinnesheen I went a generic name.
bleh, I wanted to say that I don't like using "permanent that is an artifact or enchantment" because that just sounds weird when read. Like, the meaning doesn't seem any more or less unclear than "destroy descriptor type X or descriptor type Y," but descriptor permanent type x or type y just sounds weird when said aloud. I acknowledge that repeating words is also very annoying though.
Followed SecretInfiltrator's wording advice. Fwiw, I don't like how
that creature/flash part should be its separate ability (pargraph) and be at the beginning of the text.
The word "nonsnow" contains no hyphen. The hyphens appear for subtypes since those are capitalized and "nonGoblin" apparently is bad English. :)
Also there is a new card that suggests the main text could be "Destroy target nonsnow permanent that is an artifact or enchantment." It helps to avoid repeating the same term a lot.
I couldn't find a way to fit the ability in a single, clear sentence.
Used Tahazzar's wording.
> Draw a card.
> Target player reveals their hand. Unless a snow card was revealed this way, discard a card.
?
This card sucks when compared to Peek which isn't stellar either.
I was missing a space after the 1. I had no idea that would affect the formatting here.
Updated based on SecretIlfintrator's information.
Name change