Multiverse Feedback: Recent Activity
| Multiverse Feedback: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Upcoming releases | Skeleton |
Recent updates to Multiverse Feedback: (Generated at 2025-05-13 19:43:04)
That's correct. I clicked the red X and a pop-up asking if I wanted to delete appeared. I clicked OK, the page reloaded, and the comments were still there. My most recent attempt was the two comments on Cyberman.
Are you saying that you clicked the delete button, and it tried to delete the comment, but didn't? Could you point me at an example?
That's very odd. I've printed from both Chrome and FF with card art successfully before... but yes, I see the problem now.
Oh. Oh, bother, I think the problem may be with the new token frame. All your Treasures are using the token frame, with its rounded corners, and it looks like that's what's breaking in the Chrome PDF generation (which is what it prints from).
It looks like the print preview at least is OK in Firefox (v21.0), so try giving it a go there.
Since the treasures render OK in normal browsing I suspect it's a bug in Chrome's PDF rendering of rounded corners on things with borders (which is the way I do pinlines). I'll try to isolate it and submit a bug report, because they did fix the problem with Chrome printing of gradients after I submitted that bug report.
In the meantime, either make your Treasures non-token (sadface) or print from Firefox.
Chrome. It happens after I click 'Printable', which brings me to a page with just the cards and a few details. When I print the page, though, the print preview removes the card art. It prints the same way the preview suggests it will.
Card size is spot on.
That's an odd one. The problems I've had with printing have been getting the cards to come out at the right size; images form other sites have been fine.
What OS / browser?
Sorry about the frame on this card. I had a question, not a suggestion. This seemed like the right set to ask it in, but questions don't have their own color.
Recently, I printed up the Treasures in my Treasure set. We're doing some playtesting around here for a new game, and figured they'd be good to temporarily work with. Unfortunately, when I went to print the cards, the images on each card were converted to a half-black, half-white image, since... well, I don't know why exactly. I'm sure this has to do with html coding, and the fact that the images are merely 'borrowed' from another website, but aren't stored on Multiverse. Outside of that, though, I'm out of my league.
Do you know of anyway to print cards from Multiverse's website in a way that will include the images in frame? Or maybe a program that allows people to take a snap shot of a webpage and print that (Print screen only prints the screen. The cards take up more space than just one page). I'd say something about just recreating them with MTGMaker... but that seems to be missing the point of using Multiverse.
Oh yes, good thought. I only created the Conversation set on a whim - we'd spoken about doing that at least a year ago, but I only did it when Link created Dragon's Maze Discussion.
Just because it's new, I think. It should be added, it's a good idea.
@Vitenka: I don't think that's what he's talking about. You're right, though, giving a popup of this card itself on this page isn't very sensible.
@Circeus: They're not as useless as you think. The popup from the card name of a card mockup includes info on the comments. Eg this card's popup says "1 comment about 16 hours ago by Vitenka". If I'm looking at a card in a visual spoiler, say, I often want to see if there's been any comments on it at all; if there's been any comments in the past couple of days; or whether I was the last person to comment. The info in the popup below the card mockup itself tells you all that.
The popups on links saying "N comments" themselves aren't providing much new info in that case, I'll agree.
One other thing to note is that when I get any time to work on Multiverse, one of the next big features will be decklists, which can potentially include cards from a variety of sets across Multiverse. When that comes in, the popups will include status indicating whether you have this card in your current decklist, and a button to add it to your decklist. So although they might be useless at the moment, they'll become more useful later.
Yeah; popping up the card when you're on a link of the card itself is a bit silly.
Of course I can think of the ctr+f thing, but it's at beast a crappy substitute for a straightforward method of listing cards with certain effect.
Yeah, I'd generally do this via the cardlist. The visual spoiler will also work as long as the cardset isn't so big that the VS gets split across multiple pages.
But yeah, "cardset" is a reasonable extra field to add to the search page, which is pretty basic at the moment.
If you click the cardlist link, you can then Ctrl+F (or equivalent) to find whatever you want. There's no built-in way, however.
sounds like no action required here, then
Thanks for saying about name-agnostic links, and good god, I really should try things before commenting about them ><.
I personaly don't care for link in card text, FWIW. I guess I was just being a bit of a moron.
Hmm. This does already exist: type without spaces
( ( ( C 24410 ) ) )and you get Combined Assault. As dude points out you can also do cardname linking :( ( ( Combined Assault ) ) )without spaces will link to the Combined Assault in the current cardset if there is one, and otherwise to the earliest-created card with that name.I could probably do with documenting it better though. Also, it would be nice to allow such links to change the displayed text. It's possible to go
[link text](http://multiverse.heroku.com/cards/24410)- as in fact you did in this card's text - but yeah, I could have a go at adding an easier way to do that. (I support much less formatting in card text.)I don't like playing with those regexps because it's a bit hairy trying to get things sensibly before and after the external library Markdown parsing I do, but you're right this would be worth looking into.
edited to only the non-cardname links
Really? I assumed that of course it wasn't possible because, I mean... what happens if there are homonyms, e.g. Industrial Sabotage (of which there are two)?
You already can. E.g. Combined Assault. It's done the same way as linking to inside a set.