Link's Unplaced Cards: Recent Activity
| Link's Unplaced Cards: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics |
Recent updates to Link's Unplaced Cards: (Generated at 2026-05-01 06:54:35)
| Link's Unplaced Cards: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics |
Recent updates to Link's Unplaced Cards: (Generated at 2026-05-01 06:54:35)
Can I have some opinions on Imbue as a mechanic? I think there's a lot that can be done with it, but is it too close to Imprint? To Soulbond?
How about: "Opponents may not choose your permanents as targets, if they try; instead the target is randomised"
... still doesn't work; won't cope properly with "Thing that targets 4 things"
Reworded, but still doesn't seem right.
It's the intent to allow continued mulliganing, so I'll add that for clarity.
I really like this for pretty much exactly this reason. It's a card useful enough to include at least 3x in your deck, but it's protection against the case where you have to mulligan down to 5 or lower. Of course, it'll really suck if you got down to 1 and didn't find this!
I assume that if you mulligan to 4, then find this and use it, and then mulligan again, you go to 5 not 3?
I also wonder if this needs to say something like "All players may now continue mulliganing", because I think in some formats people do their mulligans separately, so if P2 uses one of these after P1 declares no mulligans, it's not clear if P1 gets to mulligan on their new hand.
I basically took the wording from Serum Powder, which doesn't use "instead," so I didn't think this needed to do so, either.
"You may instead". Otherwise, it's a bit hazy if you could keep doing it. I mean, most people should be able to figure out that you don't win on turn 0 with this, but, you know...
I do find it funny, the times you can use this with benefit for you and your teammate. "Man... you got to mulligain to 5? Screw it. Let's just keep mulligaining. I'm bound to draw one of my four dragons sometime out of 15 cards I can possibly mulligan for." :o
So that's what the 'Legendary Library' is? Sweet!
Clearly you haven't hit up the Generator for enough cards that get +6/+4 and can't block as long as you control an untapped legendary library.
I hate to be a bug in the ointment, but I consider 'any card that requires you to know how to stack end turn triggers to get the most effect out of it' to be a failed design, no matter the cost. Though, I will admit that if you can only put this card on your "library library", then you'll only get to use the ability once, until you play a card that allows you to draw cards from your library library. ;)
I know I'm only teasing you, but now I wish there was a library library. Bonus libraries? Magic doesn't have enough zones. We need to make another one!
Ew, dude1818. You're right.
jmgariepy... maybe I'll up the cost?
Actually, you could activate the ability multiple times in a row, while previous instances are on the stack. Then, say you paid 10
: you could put five cards onto the battlefield/into your hand.
Well... that's still buggy, since you can activate this during your opponent's end step after "the beginning of the end step" is over, right? So, I'd just activate this whenever I had
open during an end step. Who needs instants and sorceries when you're packing cards like this anyhow?
Maybe the correct fix would be to change this to "The next time you would draw a card, reveal it. If it's a permanent, put it on the battlefield and draw a card." Granted, that's a different ability, but it also makes you work a little harder to trigger the Flitterer. Ponder won't do it anymore, since you'll just end up drawing the Flitterer, triggering the ability. You got to mill, rearrange or exile... and two of those options permanently gets rid of the Illusion...
Otherwise.
Forgot rarity.
Realized it didn't need "under your control."
Also Spellstoked Ephemerite.
Reminds me of Kite-Mount Raven.
Inspired by Mr. & Mrs. Kent.
Thanks! Although I make too many cards like this, as jmgariepy would probably point out. :)