Link's Unplaced Cards: Recent Activity
| Link's Unplaced Cards: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics |
Recent updates to Link's Unplaced Cards: (Generated at 2026-05-01 06:54:35)
| Link's Unplaced Cards: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics |
Recent updates to Link's Unplaced Cards: (Generated at 2026-05-01 06:54:35)
Fuunky. All my Nip Gwyllions and suchlike turn into Rise from the Grave.
You could compress the second sentence down to "Spells that spell's controller cast cost
more to cast this turn." That'd be a minor change when used on things like Urza's Rage, but worth it for the reduction in text.
Does this need to say all this, or can it just say "Spells that spell's controller cast cost
more to cast this turn?" Or "Spells the countered spell's controller casts cost 
more to casts this turn?"
Changed wording...
Added mechanic.
I considered both of those, but I tossed it out this way just so I'd remember it. If I went with either of them, it would be "Deflect X," for exactly the reason you stated: having it scale with the damage is confusing to read and to word.
I need a more flavorful name. It's meant to represent a shield of mist that has to be swept aside (by paying mana) in order for the combatant to hit the creature.
I've noticed you didn't decide to go with "Deflect 2", but instead wanted Deflect to be a static number (always 2). I think I prefer the former, but I can dig the latter. I was also wondering if you thought of making this "unless its source's controller pays
for each damage prevented", or if you thought that was too confusing?