Link's Unplaced Cards: Recent Activity
| Link's Unplaced Cards: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics |
Recent updates to Link's Unplaced Cards: (Generated at 2026-05-01 14:54:20)
| Link's Unplaced Cards: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics |
Recent updates to Link's Unplaced Cards: (Generated at 2026-05-01 14:54:20)
Upped to three, but is it now too strong?
Changed effect.
Somehow removing the word "fight" makes this look a lot more red.
Looking back on this, it reminds me of soulbond.
--> 
Previously tapped for
, had "{
,
: Add
, and allowed spending of
as
or 
Hmm. I forgot about this. I wonder how it plays.
,
" for the cost, since you don't even break even otherwise.
I wonder if it could be "
Thanks!
I agree, if it affects creatures. I think if it's noncreature, though, a case could be made for it only being an activation of
. After all, not being able to do creatures means not being able to affect combat. Protection is just at its most useful on creatures.
Bah! Convention! I want FLAVOR!
Yeah, on reconsideration I think
should be the absolute minimum cost for this effect. Sygg only worked on Merfolk, and 8.5Tails needed 
in the general case.
It'd be more... conventional to have this say "~ deals 1 damage to that player".
Nice!
Dropped cost and added "nonland."
Realized this had no card types.
Can mana deal damage?
I don't know, it should probably cost more, since Sygg and Tailsy are legendary. That or it should be limited to noncreature artifacts.
Ah, another in the Eight-and-a-Half-Tails / Sygg, River Guide family. A much cheaper effect, but restricted to only work on artifacts, so probably fine.