....why do I have "yackity sax" playing in my head now? This kobold wants to be Indiana Jones, and so much isn't :)
Not much else to say; it's a french-vanilla and a perfectly good one. Though given the picture, I'm so tempted to suggest "Lizard Coward" instead of warrior :)
I'm liking these cross-colour activations. I'm not sure I like so much that this one is secretly a Howl from Beyond, since you can activate it past the point it will die.
But sure, it's uncommon; fine from a complexity point of view. Just feels ick to me for no good reason.
Thanks for the feedback, had the same idea @jmgariepy, just as one sentence with "then" inbetween.
Switch the power and toughness of target creature you control until end of turn, then switch the power and toughness of target creature you don't control until end of turn.
What is better, 2 sentences or one run on sentence? Both ways take up about as much space on the card.
Both +1/+1 counters and -1/-1 counters in the same block is a nono, but there's no prohibition in having them in adjacent blocks. Otherwise you'd need two blocks with neither either side of a -1/-1 counter block.
Oh wow, if this isn't meant to swap creature A's power for creature B's power then yes, the wording definitely wants to change. jmgariepy's wording is much more comprehensible.
Unusually high P/T combination for a red common. But it's a freaking horde of dinosaurs. Stylish vanilla.
I think two sentences is cleaner. Gives the card more punch.
As a single sentence - I don't think adding 'then' changes the meaning.
Fair enough; again; not a show stopper, just a slight worry.
And I didn't mention the name - which is just so fantastic. Not something that would make it into a real set; but do keep it. It's great.
Wow; flyspeck3. On a common. Noooot a good idea. Ah, but it's mainly because Apex has somehow expanded wrongly.
And Apex makes you total up the power of each player's creatures? Euuu.... Suggest it just be "If it has (joint) highest power"?
Saurids. Soar-Rids? Sow-Rids? ... mmm, not grabbing me as a name. Personally I'd have gone with something like: Hot blooded now.
....why do I have "yackity sax" playing in my head now? This kobold wants to be Indiana Jones, and so much isn't :)
Not much else to say; it's a french-vanilla and a perfectly good one. Though given the picture, I'm so tempted to suggest "Lizard Coward" instead of warrior :)
I'm liking these cross-colour activations. I'm not sure I like so much that this one is secretly a Howl from Beyond, since you can activate it past the point it will die.
But sure, it's uncommon; fine from a complexity point of view. Just feels ick to me for no good reason.
I know it happened before, but it having 2 blocks with neither shouldn't be too hard, even if +1/+1 counters are almost ubiquitous these days.
Thanks for the feedback, had the same idea @jmgariepy, just as one sentence with "then" inbetween.
Switch the power and toughness of target creature you control until end of turn, then switch the power and toughness of target creature you don't control until end of turn.
What is better, 2 sentences or one run on sentence? Both ways take up about as much space on the card.
Both +1/+1 counters and -1/-1 counters in the same block is a nono, but there's no prohibition in having them in adjacent blocks. Otherwise you'd need two blocks with neither either side of a -1/-1 counter block.
Oh wow, if this isn't meant to swap creature A's power for creature B's power then yes, the wording definitely wants to change. jmgariepy's wording is much more comprehensible.