Archester Revival: Recent Activity
| Archester Revival: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Skeleton |
Recent updates to Archester Revival: (Generated at 2025-07-01 23:49:29)
| Archester Revival: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Skeleton |
Recent updates to Archester Revival: (Generated at 2025-07-01 23:49:29)
I copy cards word for word from the thread for bookkeeping reasons. This is obviously way over the curve for a common.
I copy all cards from the thread word for word for bookkeeping purposes. I agree this thing is way over the curve for a common. Not sure if I want to nerf it or bump its rarity though.
I love the design but it might be a bit too wordy for a common. :-/
Remember that you can link to cards in the multiverse! click "formatting help" to find out how!
Moved discarding to the activation cost
I think this might windup (no pun intended) being oppressive in limited with both 1st strike and vigilance.
Back when this card was made, one of the rules of Red looting was that it could get card advantage when its hand was empty. Cards like Dangerous Wager kind of express this. However, since its introduction red hasn't gotten any looters with card advantage potential. A lot of this has to do with the fact that Chandrawing has since become a popular red card advantage tool, thus reducing the need for that type of effect. While I'm personally still a fan of this kind of thing every now and then, I'm fine with moving toward the more modern wording.
Given the Thopter theme in
, I think this would be more interesting if it started as a 0/2 or 0/3, that way it'd have to windup at least once before it can block and kill the thopters.
We'll get to card codes later once I have the skeleton up. You're right that it goes in that slot though.
great simple windup common.
Cost increased from
to 
Reduced boost from +2/+1 to +1/+0
Basic land feels weird, I'm fine with the size reduction. In general though this card is a hold out from the old set in an archetype that might be going away anyway.
would this be better as "Remove a +1/+1 counter from ~: Target creature can't attack or block this turn."? or would that be too good since it's repeatable? I mean as it is, it's kinda like a creature version of Change of Heart, so why not go ahead and make it a temporary Pacifism too?
Nonhybrid cards shouldn't be artifacts.
Nonhybrid cards shouldn't be artifacts.
Nonhybrid creatures shouldn't be artifacts.
Nonhybrid cards shouldn't be artifacts.
Nonhybrid cards shouldn't be artifacts.
Nonhybrid cards shouldn't be artifacts