Multiverse Design Challenge: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity
All challenges | Upcoming Challenges | Make a new design challenge! | All challenges (text)

CardName: Challenge # 117 Cost: Type: Challenge Pow/Tgh: / Rules Text: There are cards with an activated ability costing {X} that restrict you to pay all black mana, all red mana, or all white mana. Design a card with an activated ability costing {X} that can only be paid with blue or green mana. Flavour Text: Set/Rarity: Multiverse Design Challenge None

Challenge # 117
 
Challenge
There are cards with an activated ability costing {x} that restrict you to pay all black mana, all red mana, or all white mana. Design a card with an activated ability costing {x} that can only be paid with blue or green mana.
Updated on 04 Feb 2015 by Alex

History: [-]

2015-01-19 15:03:40: Alex created and commented on the card Challenge # 117

The Fate Reforged Oracle update bulletin mentioned

> Atalya, Samite Master; Crimson Hellkite; Crypt Rats >
> These three cards all have an activated ability with an X in the activation cost that's restricted to a specific color of mana.

Why has there never been a green X activation or a blue X activation? Put this to rights!

Note: There's not very much difference between an ability like Crypt Rats's and one like Pestilence. Crypt Rats is clearer that you can activate it for 10 even if the Rats only have 1 toughness: you could do that if the ability was just Pestilence's, but newer players might get confused. (Also it works better to give Crypt Rats lifelink this way.)

So ideally, you'd find abilities of the form "{x}: Do something with X" that have a justification for not being "{g}: Do something 1 time". That's the tricky bit here.

FWIW, I remember comments on Demonspine Whip on http://archive.wizards.com/Magic/magazine/Article.aspx?x=mtg/daily/ld/40 saying for repeatable abilities, wizards weren't sure between {1} and {x}. But I agree, there's a benefit to being {g} not {x} so you don't have to spell out "spend only".

Fascinating challenge. I still mentally assume monocolour decks, so I have to remind myself that "spend only G" makes a real different to the strength of the effect, not only flavour :)

I made Form-Carver as the most obvious example I could think of that required X y could also feasibly require only green mana for both developmental and flavor reasons.

I made Rhonite Artisan and forgot to link to it here.

That wouldn't be very hard for green. I imagine it would be something along the lines of Green Sun's Zenith or Chord of Calling.

As for blue, I made Power of Thought. The wording is a bit confusing, but I think it makes enough sense, and I think the effect is fairly balanced.

Add your comments:


(formatting help)
Enter mana symbols like this: {2}{U}{U/R}{PR}, {T} becomes {2}{u}{u/r}{pr}, {t}
You can use Markdown such as _italic_, **bold**, ## headings ##
Link to [[[Official Magic card]]] or (((Card in Multiverse)))
Include [[image of official card]] or ((image or mockup of card in Multiverse))
Make hyperlinks like this: [text to show](destination url)
What is this card's power? Runeclaw Bear
(Signed-in users don't get captchas and can edit their comments)