Multiverse Design Challenge: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity
All challenges | Upcoming Challenges | Make a new design challenge! | All challenges (text)

CardName: Loyal Golem Cost: 2 Type: Artifact Creature - Golem Pow/Tgh: 2/2 Rules Text: Loyal Golem can't attack or block unless you control a red creature. Flavour Text: Set/Rarity: Multiverse Design Challenge Common

Loyal Golem
{2}
 
 C 
Artifact Creature – Golem
Loyal Golem can't attack or block unless you control a red creature.
2/2
Updated on 30 Sep 2014 by Jack V

History: [-]

2014-09-29 21:52:20: Jack V created and commented on the card Loyal Golem

See Challenge # 112.

I saw the Rohn as the creative impulsive passionate side of red, with the golems inevitably as colourless. That probably means pairing red with artifact creatures, but I think that's ok if unusual.

I wasn't quite sure how to do that, and then I remembered the servant-of-personal-creator aspect, and decided the "need a red creature" worked well. I'm not sure of the exact trade-off, should it maybe let you pay {3} instead, so it's usable but clunky without a red creature? Or just accept it's completely blank?

I envisaged a small number of creatures with this ability, say a 2/2, 5/5 and 2/1 flying (gargoyle rather than golem) at common, and maybe some at higher rarities. I think that's enough, without needing a keyword, or to make it be on ALL artifact creatures. Also see Spitting Gargoyle for a similar take on a red burn spell.

Is this meant to be an artifact creature, rather than just colourless?

It's a strongly flavourful ability that's quite a hefty drawback; I suspect this can be at least 2/3 for 2 if not bigger.

Nice job capturing some of the flavor of the golem servants. It reminds me of Loyal Pegasus/ War Falcon.

2014-09-30 05:04:52: Jack V edited Loyal Golem:

Added "artifact"

@Alex, thank you, oops, no I just forgot. If I deliberately make a colourless creature, I'll make a big deal of it in the comment :) I considered that for Pale, I liked your description of "coloured mana implies the verdant gorges, and colourless implies the barren surface wastes" (although you probably meant that just for lands, not creatures).

Yeah, the power-level needs to be adjusted. Possibilities:

  • bigger stats
  • drawback only on attacking, not blocking
  • pay R instead of controlling creature (I'm not sure if that's weaker, it's less swingy, but less aggro)
  • add option to pay colourless mana instead

Thoughts?

Add your comments:


(formatting help)
Enter mana symbols like this: {2}{U}{U/R}{PR}, {T} becomes {2}{u}{u/r}{pr}, {t}
You can use Markdown such as _italic_, **bold**, ## headings ##
Link to [[[Official Magic card]]] or (((Card in Multiverse)))
Include [[image of official card]] or ((image or mockup of card in Multiverse))
Make hyperlinks like this: [text to show](destination url)
How much damage does this card deal? Lava Axe
(Signed-in users don't get captchas and can edit their comments)