Multiverse Design Challenge: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity
All challenges | Upcoming Challenges | Make a new design challenge! | All challenges (text)

CardName: Spitting Gargoyle Cost: 1 Type: Artifact Pow/Tgh: / Rules Text: {R} or {3}, {T}, sacrifice Spitting Gargoyle: Spitting Gargoyle deals 3 damage to target creature or player. Flavour Text: Set/Rarity: Multiverse Design Challenge Common

Spitting Gargoyle
{1}
 
 C 
Artifact
{r} or {3}, {t}, sacrifice Spitting Gargoyle: Spitting Gargoyle deals 3 damage to target creature or player.
Updated on 30 Sep 2014 by Jack V

History: [-]

2014-09-29 22:01:04: Jack V created and commented on the card Spitting Gargoyle

See Challenge # 112.

I loved the flavour of the Rohn, but I had to struggle to think of how to do burn spells in a culture themed around sculpting not fireblasts :) So I decided to embrace the golems even further, and imagine lesser golems as traditional face-only gargoyles.

I can't do all red common burn spells like this, but some it hopefully ok. I didn't want coloured artifacts, and felt it was cheating to have a red only activation but no red in the cost, so I gave it an alternative cost, but not a very attractive one. That's not a perfect compromise -- it's strong enough it will usually be snapped up in red decks, but hopefully it will find a useful niche somewhere.

This is actually probably too good as colourless burn. This is more damage than Moonglove Extract for only 1 more mana; see also Flamecast Wheel. I approve of the idea though. In another set I'd expect this to be part of a cycle, but presumably not here :)

Interesting! Gargoyles are a sensible creature type for Rohn. I expected this to be a creature when I first saw the name.
It's interesting that you sought to have the "common 'red' burn spell" come from Rohn. This is an interesting but potentially powerful design.

@Alex: Oops! Ok, well, I'm sure I can tweak the cost to make it even worse. I'm actually happier if it's at least slightly playable as colourless.

And yes, this is a rare exception, where there will be red-aligned artifacts only (unless I decide the rohn have another colour). I figure if it's ok for esper, it's ok for rohn :)

@Link Thank you! Yeah, I need to tweak the name a bit, it should be something that makes it obvious it's not a creature, but I also wanted to hammer home the golem/gargoyle theme on my example cards. Ideally it would be a word meaning "gargoyle face" specifically (not whole creature), but I couldn't quite get something to fit.

I immediately saw the Rohn as red, and none of the other cities as especially red, so that was my first thought. I'm interested to see other people's interpretations! I think other people would assign the colours a bit differently. I guess I could also just have a natural phenomenon like lightning, or flavour it as an attack from a plains beast (I see those as all colours and colourless).

I saw Rohn as red-and-blue, the Roamers as green-and-red, and the Pale Ones as either colourless or all colours. I imagine Roamers could have a burn spell or two as well.

Add your comments:


(formatting help)
Enter mana symbols like this: {2}{U}{U/R}{PR}, {T} becomes {2}{u}{u/r}{pr}, {t}
You can use Markdown such as _italic_, **bold**, ## headings ##
Link to [[[Official Magic card]]] or (((Card in Multiverse)))
Include [[image of official card]] or ((image or mockup of card in Multiverse))
Make hyperlinks like this: [text to show](destination url)
What is this card's power? Kindercatch
(Signed-in users don't get captchas and can edit their comments)