CardName: Graceful Unicorn
Cost: 1W
Type: Creature - Unicorn
Pow/Tgh: 2/2
Rules Text: Purity (Graceful Unicorn has protection from permanents and
spells controlled by a player who attacked you or targeted
you since your last turn.)
Flavour Text:
Set/Rarity: Multiverse Design Challenge None
Graceful Unicorn
Creature – Unicorn
Purity (Graceful Unicorn has protection from permanents and spells controlled by a player who attacked you or targeted you since your last turn.)
Magic has had unicorns since alpha, but very very few, and only one or two have any particular mechanical identity. I almost wonder if they should be lumped in with horses?
It is hard to get a unicorn-appropriate mechanic.
This is my effort, based on the "only capturable by an innocent" idea. I don't entirely like it, it has too many memory issues, but it's the best I could come up with.
It seems a little similar to werewolves, except there's no toggle to remind you when it has protection, which is a problem.
I'm not sure exactly how the rule should be written -- I think they should be able to attack every other turn without triggering protection, but I'm not sure if they fireball you during their first main phase, the unicorn should gain protection immediately or not?
For Challenge # 083
Magic has had unicorns since alpha, but very very few, and only one or two have any particular mechanical identity. I almost wonder if they should be lumped in with horses?
It is hard to get a unicorn-appropriate mechanic.
This is my effort, based on the "only capturable by an innocent" idea. I don't entirely like it, it has too many memory issues, but it's the best I could come up with.
It seems a little similar to werewolves, except there's no toggle to remind you when it has protection, which is a problem.
I'm not sure exactly how the rule should be written -- I think they should be able to attack every other turn without triggering protection, but I'm not sure if they fireball you during their first main phase, the unicorn should gain protection immediately or not?
ETA: Oh, and suggestions for a less generic name?