Multiverse Design Challenge: Recent Activity
| Multiverse Design Challenge: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| All challenges | Upcoming Challenges | Make a new design challenge! | All challenges (text) |
Recent updates to Multiverse Design Challenge: (Generated at 2025-05-18 23:12:03)
"As it enters the battlefield". You'd be just as dead if you waited for the ETB trigger.
I think these squirrels need to be errataed to say "Creature -- Squirrel Cultist". ;)
Thank you guys! Editing my entry.
...Should probably place a token when it ETBs. Otherwise playing it would cause you to lose instantly.
Form of 1000 Frogs using Frog Ninja. Awesome token! :)
And new token: Cloud
See Challenge # 145.
See Challenge # 145.
A bit too wordy but I can't decide what I can bear to cut.
Interesting! Plays in a similar space as Blood Moon.
Made Day of the Squirrel using Squirrel (yay! :))
And new tokens: Snake and Demon
See Challenge # 145.
See Challenge # 145.
See Challenge # 145 using Squirrel
I tried to think when a squirrel would be 6/6, this seems to fit! :)
The format is
(((C12345))), where 12345 is the card's ID as seen in the URL. But you don't need to remember it - any time you mouseover a link to a Multiverse card, such as in the Recent Activity log or the "So-and-so created the card" entry on the card's own page, Multiverse gives you a popup preview of the card, which includes a link at the bottom saying "Link to this card". That link generates the (((Cwhatever))) code for you.Haha, it's okay jmgariepy. I enjoyed reading that.
Jack's suggested method is how I do all card links. The card ID number is found most easily at the end of the URL.
Doh, thank you.
I think the quickest way is ((( C##### ))) where ##### is the card id number. But I'm not sure if there's an easier way. I forgot I made a dup until after I did it, but it was hard to avoid with tokens.
Oh. Hmpf. I can't remember how to link to a unique card that shares the same name with another card (Specifically, 'Elemental' #2.) What's the format, Alex?
Added Squirrel.
For Challenge # 145. Mostly, I couldn't resist.
Well, it's not a terribly weird assumption. According to Wikipedia, only 3.8% of people from the United States identify as gay, bisexual, or transgender (A lot of people on Multiverse hail from England, I know. And England doesn't got our bible belt. But I presume the numbers in Europe ain't that different. Let's just round up to 4%.) https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBT_demographics_of_the_United_States
That's a smaller number than the 'one in ten' figure that's bandied about. Probably because homosexuality isn't a destination, but a spectrum. After all, a Williams Institute report found 11% who admitted to harboring a same sex attraction at some point. But we're talking about how people identify themselves, neh? And if that's the case, we should probably stick to the 4%.
So run the numbers. 4 goes into 100 25 times. One in every 25 identify as LGBT. There's only 10 or so really consistent posters. So it is possible, but more of an outside chance. If we counted everyone who's made some sort of consistent contribution in the past 2 years however... what's that, like fifty plus people? Odds say one of those people is likely to identify.
Though, I got to apologize, Link. I found the statistical riddle to be interesting, but completely ignored the human element. I'm not, but we had this conversation before. I should probably let someone who is actually LGBT do the talking...