Multiverse Design Challenge: Recent Activity

Multiverse Design Challenge: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity

All challenges | Upcoming Challenges | Make a new design challenge! | All challenges (text)

Recent updates to Multiverse Design Challenge: (Generated at 2025-05-13 18:36:25)

• 2011-07-20 01:36:49: Camruth commented on Challenge # 003

  These are my 3 entries: (((Desecrated Sphinx))), (((Rage-Driven Vampire))) & (((Land Leviathan))).
  Hopefully I met the requirements of the challenge - I think all three fit well into the colours they have been 'shifted' to whilst still retaining at least a hint of their origins.

• 2011-07-20 01:34:00: Camruth commented on a card
• 2011-07-20 01:33:13: Camruth edited Desecrated Sphinx
• 2011-07-20 01:32:30: Camruth edited Desecrated Sphinx
• 2011-07-20 01:31:38: Camruth created the card Desecrated Sphinx
• 2011-07-20 01:27:11: Camruth commented on a card
• 2011-07-20 01:25:18: Camruth created the card Rage-Driven Vampire
• 2011-07-20 01:20:36: Camruth edited Land Leviathan
• 2011-07-20 01:20:02: Camruth commented on a card
• 2011-07-20 01:18:35: Camruth created the card Land Leviathan
• 2011-07-20 01:05:45: Alex commented on Loam Wanderer

  The rest of this cycle seem pleasingly balanced. But this one seems overpowered in both its modes. Green shouldn't get a 3/3 for 2 mana, and just in creature mode this is better than that. And cycled, this is like an Aura for saying "Enchanted creature gets +2/+2. When ~ ETBs, draw a card." Ritual of Steel / Krovikan Fetish / Scavenged Weaponry say that for a three-mana cantrip, you get 2 points divided between boosting power and toughness, not 4.

• 2011-07-20 01:02:22: Alex commented on Soul Wanderer

  I think these numbers should sync up. Renewed Faith cycled for and 2 life, so this could as well.

• 2011-07-20 01:00:57: Alex commented on Indomitable Warrior

  Indeed fascinating. I hadn't even realised the interaction with wither and infect... I'm not sure that works. Suppose this gets hit by Flowstone Embrace, what happens? Does it get +2/-2?

  What about if its power and toughness are switched? Boggle...

  It's very cool. I suspect it could be printed, with defined answers to these questions. They'd just be somewhat confusing. Perhaps confusing enough that it wouldn't be printed, I'm not sure.

  Anyway, I like the cycle.

• 2011-07-19 22:01:06: Link commented on Challenge # 003

  I just realized this says three... I automatically assumed it said five. I need to start paying closer attention.

• 2011-07-19 21:13:54: Link edited Great Seatangle
• 2011-07-19 21:12:20: Link commented on Bloodhunger Ogre

  Somewhat better... I guess.

• 2011-07-19 21:12:09: Link edited Bloodhunger Ogre
• 2011-07-19 20:40:28: Link commented on Indomitable Warrior

  I dislike designing green and red cards, so I'm glad at least one of them turned out well. Haha.

• 2011-07-19 20:34:25: Link commented on Bloodhunger Ogre

  "If CARDNAME would deal damage to a player, it deals that much damage to target creature instead" is the ideal ability, but it doesn't line up with the rest of the cycle and is possibly too good.

• 2011-07-19 20:32:54: Link commented on Bloodhunger Ogre

  This is definitely the loser of the cycle. lol

• 2011-07-19 20:17:08: Jack V commented on Bloodhunger Ogre

  Yeah, I can't see a good rephrasing. (And unfortunately, it doesn't seem very red -- it's essentially the same as "defender")

• 2011-07-19 20:16:19: Jack V commented on Indomitable Warrior

  Ooh, that's a great green ability. Treading rarely-trod ground but easy to understand. A bit like hexproof, but strong against some black removal, but also wither and infect.

• 2011-07-19 19:50:57: Link commented on Bloodhunger Ogre

  I wish I could like up his wording with the others in the cycle, but this is how he should be worded rules-wise.

• 2011-07-19 19:50:20: Link commented on Resentful Mercenary

  For Challenge # 002.

• 2011-07-19 19:50:00: Link commented on Tenacious Knight

  For Challenge # 002.

• 2011-07-19 19:49:37: Link commented on Unwilling Assistant

  For Challenge # 002.

• 2011-07-19 19:49:33: Link edited Unwilling Assistant
• 2011-07-19 19:47:54: Link commented on Challenge # 002

  Okay, here is my (hopefully better) attempt. I hope the connection is clear enough. Tenacious Knight, Unwilling Assistant, Resentful Mercenary, Bloodhunger Ogre, and Indomitable Warrior.

• 2011-07-19 19:47:41: Link commented on Bloodhunger Ogre

  For Challenge # 002.

• 2011-07-19 19:47:32: Link edited Bloodhunger Ogre