Multiverse Design Challenge: Recent Activity
| Multiverse Design Challenge: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| All challenges | Upcoming Challenges | Make a new design challenge! | All challenges (text) |
Recent updates to Multiverse Design Challenge: (Generated at 2025-07-06 03:20:13)
For Challenge # 016
He likes adding counters and making tokens :)
I'm saving my more out-of-the-box challenge for a little later.
Confused Orders answered by Spell-Thought-Word-Thingy Mancer
May try again later :)
Really wanted to write "Enchant non-vanilla creature / You control it." but probably wouldn't have been allowed.
I think the way it'd be done is "Shuffle your library, then reveal the top nine cards."
Hm. Really? I thought this was the one of my four entries where the flavour worked the most clearly. What do other people think?
Does searching for random cards work?
I have a hard time reconciling this ability with the flavor text.
Created for Challenge # 015 as an answer to Moral Decay. The full source quote:
> Whenever evil befalls us, we ought to ask ourselves, after the first suffering, how we can turn it into good. So shall we take occasion, from one bitter root, to raise perhaps many flowers.
I first wanted to give this an effect that triggered on opponents destroying your creatures, like Thraben Sentry but more meditative. But the mechanical implementation of Moral Decay guided me to make this work off loss of life instead.
Created for Challenge # 015.
This challenge is tricky, isn't it? We can end up with a bunch of interesting designs, but they may not be especially clearly tied to the flavour we were going for.
Ah! I didn't notice the beginning of upkeep trigger. I assumed it was "T:". That certainly explains why giving the creature indestructibility isn't such a big deal...
Changed to "that player". Thank you.
The name is supposed to represent the fact that the more experience you have with countering your opponent's stuff, the better you get at making Homonoculus. That's probably not coming though, though, because there's a disconnect between the two abilities, and the new thing that this card does, and thus the point of focus, is care about whether your opponent's stuff is being countered. Perhaps I'll come back to this quote and try a different card later.
"A player cast a spell that wasn't counters" isn't going to work so well. If I cast Wrath of God, and you respond with Counterspell, then all my spells were countered but you cast one that wasn't. I think "that player" would work.
I don't quite get the name. Seems to be rewarding you for making the opponent's life as difficult as possible (countering all their stuff).
Well, it depends on whether Independent Streak is used as a removal spell or a defense spell. If Player A puts Independent Streak on Player B's aggressive creature, then this is a good response by Player B to make the creature useful again. But if Player A puts Independent Streak on their own creature, then this is a good combo with it.
You know what? Let's just call a spade a shovel. Changed the "successfully cast" wording to "Unless a player cast a spell that wasn't countered", which took less words to express anyway.