Misc Design for future sets.: Recent Activity
Misc Design for future sets.: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Mechanics |
Recent updates to Misc Design for future sets.: (Generated at 2025-10-03 13:22:50)
True. Both rely on luck to work (as do all in this cycle of Illusions). Does this work for filling the not so good rare slot for a set?
I'm not sure this is a good idea for a rare, really. When Phantasmal Dragon is uncommon, going bigger isn't really going to help - it just makes your huge beatstick even more swingy (luck-dependent).
It is. Is there a better cost for this that will allow it to still be rare, while not being bested by Phantasmal Dragon?
+2/+2 for only
seems like a big jump.
Yes. I tend to design my cards before looking at similar things already printed. It keeps my creativity high and lets me see how close my designs are to whats already done.
Phantasmal Dragon but bigger?
This is a un-type card
I can see that happening in casual and formats where there are still 2 mana counter spells. Though I think that in the current standard of design it will not be that much of an issue. But then again I may be wrong.
Edit: I also didn't mean for this to have two instances of Cascade.