Dark Omens: Recent Activity
Dark Omens: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Mechanics | The Pridelands | The Lushwood | Stonefast Mountains | The Valurian Empire | Skeleton |
Recent updates to Dark Omens: (Generated at 2024-05-02 12:11:55)
changed 1st ability from 'choose a' to 'choose up to one' so that it is always relevant.
fixed to appear at end of list as token
fixed to appear at end of list as token
fixed to appear at end of list as token
fixed to appear at end of list as token
fixed to appear at end of list as token
brought in line with Oracle wording for Verdant Force
Original version was pretty much Tangle but with the bit about tapping attackers to deal with Vigilance. It WAS too good so I made the change to Fog-becomes-Tangle if paid. Great in the right decks but not so splashable.
Mmm, nice. Tangle is a bit too good these days, but this is a Fog that sometimes acts as a Tangle/Sleep in a green-blue deck.
Fair enough. Those are actually good points (even though some players don't think they are).
Yes Alex it is worse (though I bumped it to 3/3), but Snapping Drake wasn't right for the set and you need to design less good (great English there I know) cards, say to go in hypothetical pre-constructed decks so new players have options as they learn about what to keep/remove
Blue still doesn't get 3/3s for 4 at common or uncommon. It's very rare for blue to get a Phantom Monster. But it does occasionally get a 4/3 OR 4/4 flyer for 4 like Conundrum Sphinx. Thanks, rarity. :/
Did you know that the developers considered Giant Octopus in 9th edition to be a mistake because it was too good? Crazy, huh? It's been a number of years since, Hill Giant is no longer a strong draft pick and I'm pretty sure Giant Octopus is par for the course nowadays. I just find it funny that a 3/3 for 3U was too efficient a ground pounder in 2005.
Seems pretty bad compared with, say, Snapping Drake. Or Giant Octopus.