isn't a type of mana you produce: Instead, it's a cost that represents generic mana that can be paid with one mana of any type produced by a snow permanent. Because of this, Boreal Druid'produces '.
Hmm; well, now it's a one-sided wrath. But a much less powerful one. I'd still keep an eye on it, it's very possible that this will be terrifyingly strong. But losing some creatures isn't so bad compared to losing your lands. It's not a lock-down if used early.
okay, how about i change the land hate, it's not working..
I'm looking for a theme of pollution, something on the lines of making all cards black, but that seems useless, -1/-1 counters? Overused.
Idk, maybe ill throw something out until i can get something better, or one of you has an idea for me (and im sorry for always asking you guys to make my sets for me, shame on me)
Usually you hurt non-basic lands. You can always put together decks without non-basic lands; it's much harder to put one together without basic land.
But this is such a ridiculous one-sided land nuke, it just probably shouldn't be printed. Yes it requires to to have some dead zombies. So it can only go in a black deck. And that's the only restriction. Playing black? Play this. Win.
okay i just realised what secretinfiltrator meant by EVEN WITHOUT RETURNING MANA, so i took out the mana addition, also nerfed with basic land only, better now?
Oh good point.
I tried nerfing it with the more than five rule, but maybe that is less a nerf than an incentive for spike?(tell me if i used that magic slang right)
Now that i think about it, way too strong, i would add life payment, but again, that is still 10 lands, i think i should decrease the mana output and then see if it is fine
Let's say this would just let you destroy one land in exchange for one Zombie card from your graveyard and sacrificing without returning you a bunch of mana... even that would be nasty.
wow that is a big surprise, i'm definitely gonna have to keep that in mind. okay, well then i will edit this.
isn't a type of mana you produce: Instead, it's a cost that represents generic mana that can be paid with one mana of any type produced by a snow permanent. Because of this, Boreal Druid 'produces 
'.
a cross between that and llanowar elves, yeah :P
Birds of Paradice
thanks!
Hmm; well, now it's a one-sided wrath. But a much less powerful one. I'd still keep an eye on it, it's very possible that this will be terrifyingly strong. But losing some creatures isn't so bad compared to losing your lands. It's not a lock-down if used early.
okay, how about i change the land hate, it's not working..
I'm looking for a theme of pollution, something on the lines of making all cards black, but that seems useless, -1/-1 counters? Overused.
Idk, maybe ill throw something out until i can get something better, or one of you has an idea for me (and im sorry for always asking you guys to make my sets for me, shame on me)
Usually you hurt non-basic lands. You can always put together decks without non-basic lands; it's much harder to put one together without basic land.
But this is such a ridiculous one-sided land nuke, it just probably shouldn't be printed. Yes it requires to to have some dead zombies. So it can only go in a black deck. And that's the only restriction. Playing black? Play this. Win.
Do you suggest I change it to something else? Not too familiar with what lands im supposed to be targeting :P
Why on Earth did this hate on basic lands anyway? Those are the kind of lands design specifically avoid hurting.
okay i just realised what secretinfiltrator meant by EVEN WITHOUT RETURNING MANA, so i took out the mana addition, also nerfed with basic land only, better now?
Oh good point. I tried nerfing it with the more than five rule, but maybe that is less a nerf than an incentive for spike?(tell me if i used that magic slang right)
Now that i think about it, way too strong, i would add life payment, but again, that is still 10 lands, i think i should decrease the mana output and then see if it is fine
I will update it.
There's no explicit reason a player can't gain abilities, and it would be a lot simpler to understand than your current wording.
Let's say this would just let you destroy one land in exchange for one Zombie card from your graveyard and sacrificing without returning you a bunch of mana... even that would be nasty.
what is bizarre about it? Not a normal design, but i wouldn't call it unrealistic, i thought it creative
@Link pretty sure players dont gain abilities :P
@Vitenka That would be greatly more powerful if you cast it when you want, it's much more unbiased this way
Or just "Destroy all creatures, tap all lands"
This is a bizarre card, especially the wording. What about:
UEOT, each player gains "
: Destroy target creature."
Oh, that's nasty. :\