Oh, that's nasty. :\

Let's say this would just let you destroy one land in exchange for one Zombie card from your graveyard and sacrificing without returning you a bunch of mana... even that would be nasty.

Oh good point. I tried nerfing it with the more than five rule, but maybe that is less a nerf than an incentive for spike?(tell me if i used that magic slang right)

Now that i think about it, way too strong, i would add life payment, but again, that is still 10 lands, i think i should decrease the mana output and then see if it is fine

okay i just realised what secretinfiltrator meant by EVEN WITHOUT RETURNING MANA, so i took out the mana addition, also nerfed with basic land only, better now?

Why on Earth did this hate on basic lands anyway? Those are the kind of lands design specifically avoid hurting.

Do you suggest I change it to something else? Not too familiar with what lands im supposed to be targeting :P

Usually you hurt non-basic lands. You can always put together decks without non-basic lands; it's much harder to put one together without basic land.

But this is such a ridiculous one-sided land nuke, it just probably shouldn't be printed. Yes it requires to to have some dead zombies. So it can only go in a black deck. And that's the only restriction. Playing black? Play this. Win.

okay, how about i change the land hate, it's not working..

I'm looking for a theme of pollution, something on the lines of making all cards black, but that seems useless, -1/-1 counters? Overused.

Idk, maybe ill throw something out until i can get something better, or one of you has an idea for me (and im sorry for always asking you guys to make my sets for me, shame on me)

Hmm; well, now it's a one-sided wrath. But a much less powerful one. I'd still keep an eye on it, it's very possible that this will be terrifyingly strong. But losing some creatures isn't so bad compared to losing your lands. It's not a lock-down if used early.

thanks!