Multiverse: Archenemy Schemes: Recent Activity

2012-03-04 06:36:02: jmgariepy commented on Mortal Flesh Is Weak

2012-03-04 06:35:46: jmgariepy created the card Mortal Flesh Is Weak

2012-03-04 06:34:25: jmgariepy commented on Look Skyward and Despair

2012-03-04 06:34:00: jmgariepy commented on May Civilization Collapse

2012-03-04 06:33:41: jmgariepy created the card May Civilization Collapse

2012-03-04 06:32:46: jmgariepy created the card Look Skyward and Despair

2012-03-01 12:29:54: jmgariepy commented on Have I Shattered Your Precious Expectations?

Problem solved with English grammar. Need two separate thoughts bound together in a single sentence? Use a Semi-Colon!

2012-03-01 12:29:07: jmgariepy edited Have I Shattered Your Precious Expectations?

2012-03-01 10:38:06: Jack V commented on Have I Shattered Your Precious Expectations?

Assuming it's just one big replacement effect, I agree it works exactly how it looks like it should. The only worry in my mind was whether different sentences in one paragraph that described related replacements were one effect or multiple different effects.

Common sense says they should be one effect, and I assume that's how the rules work, but is that definite?

2012-03-01 10:21:52: Alex commented on Have I Shattered Your Precious Expectations?

This replacement effect works, because any replacement effect will only apply to a given event once (otherwise Furnace of Rath would go instantly infinite).

2012-03-01 09:43:57: jmgariepy commented on Have I Shattered Your Precious Expectations?

I suppose I could just change the costs instead, ala False Dawn. That'd show 'em. Oh, except for the one million words problem. Other than that, that'll show 'em.

2012-03-01 09:35:16: Vitenka commented on Have I Shattered Your Precious Expectations?

Well, if you're going to be silly: UEOT, red mana is blue; green mana is black...

2012-03-01 07:28:31: jmgariepy commented on Have I Shattered Your Precious Expectations?

It's true. But basic land isn't as prevalent as it used to be. I'd switch over if I had to, but I hope I don't have to. It seems more mad if the mono red player can't activate his Fire Diamond or discard his Simian Spirit Guide Without getting {w} .

2012-03-01 06:22:13: M_Houlding commented on Have I Shattered Your Precious Expectations?

I suspect they worded Naked Singularity they way they did in order to avoid any potential confusion as to whether the mana just cycles about.

2012-03-01 05:07:01: jmgariepy commented on Have I Shattered Your Precious Expectations?

What's the point of having an Archenemy Schemes set if we don't add an occasional card? I assume that those that know what Naked Singularity is would recognize this as that when they saw it. You know... in a harsher way, but without the "This will be in play for 3 rounds, so you're all pretty screwed" aftertaste.

By the way, I know my rules, but I'm no guru. Does that "If... instead" clause work? That won't result in the mana infinitely cycling about, right?

2012-03-01 05:05:13: jmgariepy created the card Have I Shattered Your Precious Expectations?

2012-03-01 04:56:23: jmgariepy edited Know Naught but Fire

2012-03-01 04:55:53: jmgariepy commented on Know Naught but Fire