Multiverse: Vibrant Affluence

Mechanics | Skeleton | Storyline | Limited Archetypes | Creature Types

Mockup
Plain

CardName: Vibrant Affluence Cost: 5GG Type: Enchantment Pow/Tgh: / Rules Text: If an effect would put one or more tokens onto the battlefield, put three times that many tokens onto the battlefield instead. Creature tokens you control get +1/+1. Flavour Text: Set/Rarity: Tesla Project Rare

Vibrant Affluence

Enchantment

If an effect would put one or more tokens onto the battlefield, put three times that many tokens onto the battlefield instead.
Creature tokens you control get +1/+1.

Updated on 14 Nov 2016 by Doombringer

Code:

History: [-]

2015-12-27 01:31:11: CasualR created the card Vibrant Affluence

2015-12-27 01:31:36: CasualR edited Vibrant Affluence:

Typing

2015-12-27 23:54:09: CasualR edited Vibrant Affluence:

Reduced anthem. Mental playtest says that is card is absurd. We'll see thougb

by Vitenka:

Well, it does cost seven. And you could always just cast doubling season twice.

So yeah, it does look nuts. But... to win with this, I need to cast it and then also make at least a few tokens?

And even then, I'm only incrementally improving my position on the board. So yes, probably not environment warping.

But wow, aspirationally exciting.

by Circeus:

{3} {g} {w} mythic :P

by CasualR:

I'd rather keep it mono colored. I have a UG duel deck in the works. Though, that could definitely works at that cost

by CasualR:

@Vitenka, I stand by my adjusted stats, especially since this plus (((Uprising of Kaladesh))) is a hilarious and almost certainly lethal two card "combo" without the additional +1/+1

by CasualR:

Only was cast once. Turned a losing board into a winning board, but only thanks to an appropriate top deck creature. I would not make this any cheaper at the least. I still think this is at level of where it should be.

This may be my pet card of the set.

2016-02-12 01:24:51: Doombringer edited Vibrant Affluence:

added to skeleton

by CasualR:

T_T As much as I love this card... I don't think this is quite doing what we need to do since we've made {g} {w} explicitly not the tokens deck.

I think the first ability is fine. I think the second needs something else.

by Jay Treat:

Why spoil an effect like QUADRUPLE YOUR TOKENS with other text?

by Inanimate:

Agree with Jay. This really should just stand on its own.

by Doombringer:

triple, not quadruple.