Community Set: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity
Mechanics | Skeleton | Common Breakdown Ref | All commons for playtesting

CardName: Indentured Servitude Cost: B Type: Enchantment - Aura Pow/Tgh: / Rules Text: Enchanted creature gets -1/-1. At the beginning of your upkeep, gain 1 life. Flavour Text: Set/Rarity: Community Set Common

Indentured Servitude
{b}
 
 C 
Enchantment – Aura
Enchanted creature gets -1/-1.
At the beginning of your upkeep, gain 1 life.
Expand text
Updated on 20 Mar 2014 by jmgariepy

Code: CB10

Active?: true

History: [-]

2014-03-14 17:17:22: Jack V created and commented on the card Indentured Servitude
on 14 Mar 2014 by Jack V:

See discussion on Doomseek.

2014-03-14 18:10:32: Alex edited Indentured Servitude
on 19 Mar 2014 by jmgariepy:

Are we sure we wouldn't want this to gain you 2 life? Or be -1/-1 and cost {1}{b}? The way the card is written right now, people are bound to compare this directly to Stab Wound, and it sure doesn't look good in comparison.

on 19 Mar 2014 by Jack V:

Feel free to tweak the numbers, I'm not sure what the right combination is. I'm worried too much lifegain may tend to stall limited games, but you're right, it should be comparable to stab wound, not worse.

2014-03-19 10:22:21: jmgariepy edited Indentured Servitude
on 19 Mar 2014 by jmgariepy:

Seeing as the original card replaced cost 2, I dropped it to 1B, and -1/-1. That's not locked in stone or anything. If people feel the effect should be bigger, and/or more expensive, we can do that.

on 19 Mar 2014 by Alex:

By comparison with Viper's Kiss, the -1/-1 version of this could be just 1 mana, I think.

I guess it's for playtesting to determine whether the -1/-1 version of this actually does enough against the other colours in the format to make it particularly worth playing.

2014-03-20 01:06:33: jmgariepy edited Indentured Servitude
on 20 Mar 2014 by jmgariepy:

Sure, changed to {b}. There's too many cards in the file that cost {b}, but there's probably too many that cost {1}{b}, too.

I think there's a point where I should probably let development handle this stuff anyway, true.

Only signed-in users are permitted to comment on this cardset. Would you like to sign in?