Arena: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Concepts, Themes, Mechanics | Skeleton |
Code: History: [-] Add your comments: |
Arena: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Concepts, Themes, Mechanics | Skeleton |
Code: History: [-] Add your comments: |
What is the difference between this and (((Agile Warrior Adept))) ? They're the same except one has first strike and the other has 2 more power. I think it might be a waste of a card slot to have 2 cards that are nearly identical without being vanilla. The
: do 1 damage ability also probably shouldn't be repeated a whole lot in one set. One last thought, if you really want to keep them both, I think the one with First Strike should be 

and this one the 

cost.
They're supposed to be homages to Kamahl, Pit Fighter and Jeska, Warrior Adept. I tried to lower they're costs and stats while still keeping the feel of them.
Yeah, I get the reference to the brother and sister.
Yeah, I thought they looked familiar, but Kamahl, Pit Fighter and Jeska, Warrior Adept were also in two seperate sets. Which is what allowed them to be so close design-wise.
I don't think it's completely ridiculous to have two uncommon pingers in a set. As long as he's careful about what other repeatable removal is at uncommon (and common) in red, it doesn't seem unviable to me.
I'm not really worried about whether or not the set as a whole works (probably a terrible design practice and affront to designers everywhere). I just like making cool mechanics and cards that fall into an over-arcing story. And I kinda had it that this set was like Planechase or Archenemy, just a huge set with a random assortment of cards.
In truth this set will probably be completely unbalanced because I play red, black, and blue, hardly ever green or white unless it is with one of the other three. Granted I could still design green and white cards that function good, it's just more fun doing red, black, and blue. :D