­Regenerate + Blustersquall

This will confuse so many people. "But I thought regenerating a creature already tapped it...?"

Not saying it's not useful; it is. It'll occasionally do good things on your creature and occasionally do good things on an opponent's creature. It'll just confuse people too.

May I suggest that the creature becomes indestructible until end of turn, instead? Or maybe prevent all damage until end of turn?

I'm guessing this is the kind of card that can't be done until they fix that mess that is the regeneration keyword.

Eh; it's functional, and I quite liked the "But that happens anywa...ahhhh... I see" thought process, personally.

The confusion of "Ok, now it's tapped, I kill it; ok, it actually regenerates, but it did that!" / "No, regenerates is having a shield, see..." is gonna come up pretty rarely; and only if the player is doing something daft. (I mean, you tapped it, why do you need to kill it NOW?)

So I like this. But yeah, potentially confusing, and it does feel like they're officially trying to get rid of regenerate.

"you tapped it, why do you need to kill it NOW?" - Royal Assassin

Ok, the sins will care. It's an unusual combination; and they could wait and kill it later ;)