Community Mashup Set: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity

CardName: Gharish Pyromancer Cost: {2}{R}{R} Type: Creature - Wizard Pow/Tgh: 1/1 Rules Text: {T}: Gharish Pyromancer deals 1 damage to target creature, and to that creature's controller. Flavour Text: Don't. Diss. The Do. {boom} Set/Rarity: Community Mashup Set Common

Gharish Pyromancer
{2}{r}{r}
 
 C 
Creature – Wizard
{t}: Gharish Pyromancer deals 1 damage to target creature, and to that creature's controller.
Don't. Diss. The Do.
{boom}
1/1
Created on 24 Aug 2012 by Vitenka

History: [-]

2012-08-24 08:44:21: Vitenka created the card Gharish Pyromancer

­Snorting Gahr + Static Discharge

A 3/3 with ramgpage, and a fairly naff mini Pyrotechnics.

I guess there's a fairly obvious combination to make there - but it's damn fiddly (one point of super-trample, one point of firstest-strike? Yuck.)

Could make a super-pyromancer from it. That's actually pretty plausible. Let's go there. Board control and hurting the opponent? Very tempting.

And as is becoming traditional for me, end on a pun.

2012-08-24 08:45:13: Vitenka edited Gharish Pyromancer:

add rarity.

You're doing well at mashing up random cards into preexisting cards recently. It's particularly impressive because I know it's not intentional: this is Rakdos Ickspitter, and we were just saying earlier this week how you're not familiar with Ravnica :)

It'd be more impressive if I was closer the the pre-existing mana costs. Though the duals confuse the heck outta me price-wise.

Ah well; I guess there's just a stupidhuge number of pre-existing cards; I'm sure to hit them sometimes :)

(1)(B)(R) -> (2)(R)(R) feels reasonable, actually, especially as the Ickspitter is really quite a good card in my experience.

1/2 or 0/2 might be fine... but, yeah. There's nothing wrong with that casting cost. I forgot about the Ickspitter and my first thought was "Ooh. Good idea."

Ok; I'm surprised it's a good card. I figured just "This has to cost more than Prodigal Sorcerer and nowadays has to be red." But board control is usually a lot more relevant than shooting the opponent for one; so it seemed likely this would be a "Looks tempting but actually, not really worth it" card.

I'm glad it's good though :)

If you want a realistic rarity, it would have to be uncommon, since pingers are no longer at common.

Lies! It's made of lies! (Yeah, this would be rather nice to get 5 or 6 of in draft, wouldn't it?)

Only signed-in users are permitted to comment on this cardset. Would you like to sign in?