For Challenge # 050. I took the quick way out and gave you both a token, and something that makes tokens at the same time. Oh, geez... someone's bound to complain. I guess I'll have to make a card that makes Rabbits.

Oh, also, I just realized how this token interacts with changelings, and I am now sketched out.

"With this ability" would be the usual template, as per Mizzium Transreliquat.

Good call, and edited. The more I think on this, though, the more I get bothered by it. Say you had Hazduhr the Abbot in play, and Jeska, Warrior Adept in play, and you cast Blades of Velis Vel on them. Well, then you could have this token creature direct those two 'rabbits' to tap. The end result? One rabbit and a very confused Jeska.

Hmm? Why so? It's not like you're tapping Hazduhr or Jeska for their abilities, and it's not like the new rabbit copies any ability except the one on this token. Unless you're doing weirdness with Quicksilver Elemental... but in fact, even then, "this ability" refers to the one currently resolving, so it doesn't matter what those other rabbits were like at all. As long as they're not Imperturbable Guardians :)

Flavor implecations, Alex! Flavor implecations! Though, if you don't see what's wrong with tapping a rabbit and a changeling and making a new rabbit in the process, I certainly won't spell that one out. ;)

Oh, this is that American usage of the word "tap" that I occasionally encounter on forums. Right.

Wouldn't this normally create a copy of itself, rather than other tokens with the same ability?