Branches of Skavjando: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity
Mechanics | References | Skeleton

CardName: Sword Bringer Cost: {W}{W} Type: Creature - Human Cleric Pow/Tgh: 2/1 Rules Text: {W},{T}: Tap target creature that was the target of another spell or ability. Transform Sword Bringer at the beginning of each combat. Flavour Text: Back side: CardName: Blade's Grace Warrior Cost: Type: Creature - Human Warrior Cleric Pow/Tgh: 2/1 Rules Text: Whenever Blade's Grace Warrior becomes the target of a spell or ability you control, Blade's Grace Warrior gets +1/+1 until end of turn. Transform Blade's Grace Warrior at the end of each combat. Flavour Text: Set/Rarity: Branches of Skavjando Common

Sword Bringer
{w}{w}
 
 C 
Creature – Human Cleric
{w},{t}: Tap target creature that was the target of another spell or ability.
Transform Sword Bringer at the beginning of each combat.
2/1
Blade's Grace Warrior
 
 C 
Creature – Human Warrior Cleric
Whenever Blade's Grace Warrior becomes the target of a spell or ability you control, Blade's Grace Warrior gets +1/+1 until end of turn.
Transform Blade's Grace Warrior at the end of each combat.
2/1
Updated on 24 Apr 2020 by Sorrow

History: [-]

2020-04-23 04:20:05: Sorrow created the card Sword Bringer

Questionable design for a common; revealing some of the nastiness in the DFC mechanic. Having two of these on the battlefield you can play around with the stack to trigger the ability of the back face of one of these by activating the ability on the front face.

And every single instance of changing base toughness on these should be a red flag for combat math by itself.

Maybe you just should on every single of these cards change the back-side triggered ability to "Remove all damage from ~ and transform it at the end of each combat."?

A sin, but I am generally noot concerned with complexity from the first ability of the front face of the card.

But the damage and transforming tooughnesses is a definite note for concern that I did not consider before. Removing damage seems strong. Do you think it might be better to give creatures the same toughness on both sides of the card instead? A number oof cdfc cards in this set already have the same toughness on both faces.

I forgot I already made Stalwart Leader who'se front face is too similar to this. I will have to redesign the front face of this card.

2020-04-24 02:44:19: Sorrow edited Sword Bringer:

Replaced first ability on front-face. Both sides have a toughness of 1.

Add your comments:


(formatting help)
Enter mana symbols like this: {2}{U}{U/R}{PR}, {T} becomes {2}{u}{u/r}{pr}, {t}
You can use Markdown such as _italic_, **bold**, ## headings ##
Link to [[[Official Magic card]]] or (((Card in Multiverse)))
Include [[image of official card]] or ((image or mockup of card in Multiverse))
Make hyperlinks like this: [text to show](destination url)
How much damage does this card deal? Lightning Bolt
(Signed-in users don't get captchas and can edit their comments)