| From The Vaults: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
|
CardName: Blightmind Thief Cost: 2U Type: Creature - Human Rogue Pow/Tgh: 1/1 Rules Text: Sacrifice Blightmind Thief: Draw a card. Infect (This creature deals damage to creatures in the form of -1/-1 counters and to players in the form of poison counters.) {3}{U}: Proliferate. (You choose any number of permanents and/or players with counters on them, then give each another counter of a kind already there.) Flavour Text: Set/Rarity: From The Vaults Uncommon
Blightmind Thief
  Sacrifice Blightmind Thief: Draw a card.
Infect (This creature deals damage to creatures in the form of -1/-1 counters and to players in the form of poison counters.)  : Proliferate. (You choose any number of permanents and/or players with counters on them, then give each another counter of a kind already there.)1/1
|
History: [-] Add your comments: |
Just a note: You don't need to add asterisks around reminder text - Multiverse italicises anything inside parentheses automatically, and adding another set of italics cancels that out.
Also,
to draw a card is only seen on rares (Archivist) or fully leveled-up uncommons (Enclave Cryptologist), and costs rather more than 
in both cases.
The curse of blue again!
I also find this card to be rather curious. Normally, you want abilities to work with synergy. But tapping to draw a card, and infect has no synergy... since you don't want to attack or block if you have this card. Tapping to draw a card and Proliferate at least doesn't get in each other's way.
Personally, I like riddles. I appreciate cards that say "Maybe you should try to make the field open so you can get in once with this guy, then proliferate to victory." Unfortunately, most other people don't like their cards to trip over themselves.
This is also incredibly similar to Viral Drake. I doubt they would get printed in the same set.
@ Alex: Oh, that explanifies things!
@ L2i0n0k7: Well, that's what I get for trying to base my cards on a set I was unfamiliar with.
To all: Basically the concept was to make a card that had a cognitive dissonance, i.e. "Do you want to attack with this guy, give your opponent -1/-1 and/or poison counters, or do you want card advantage instead?" Going either way, I mean, that it could work in a control deck or an aggro deck. I think that
for Proliferate is high, but that's the point...So attacking would be more profitable, as opposed to, "Attack opponent once, then proliferate to victory while gaining card advantage at the same time." Any suggestions as to making the intent a little more obvious would be welcome.
What you call "cognitive dissonance" in this case is usually known as "tension" in card design circles. It's interesting to read the GDS and GDS2 submissions and see the judges' opinion of the "tension" that the candidates include in their card designs. They're usually fairly scathing of it, with comments along the lines of "Either way the player ends up feeling bad".
Changed (T) to Sacrifice CARDNAME, which would definitely make it at LEAST uncommon. Would that help?
Definitely. This is now a Viral Drake which rather than flying, can cycle-from-table like the Urza's Destiny cards, Brass Secretary and Marker Beetles and so on. Seems reasonable.