Multiverse Design Challenge: Recent Activity
| Multiverse Design Challenge: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| All challenges | Upcoming Challenges | Make a new design challenge! | All challenges (text) |
Recent updates to Multiverse Design Challenge: (Generated at 2025-05-19 12:16:28)
I decided to play around with remaking certain old cards as Frogs, hence (((Giant Tree Frog))) replacing Giant Spider and (((Poison Dart Frog))) for Deadly Recluse
Not very original I know, but a bit of fun
Hmmm, I grabsy Selkie. And do horrible things with it, with Lurking Seal and Undertow Seal. Didn't go with the transformation aspect; instead went for punnery and "This is kinda more like a spell than a creature"
For my Challenge # 032
When I thought of this, I nearly did "make a top-down design around a biblical reference" instead, but I decided that would be a bit complicated :)
I went back and forth on exactly what would make frogs, and whether they would be for all players. Ideally I wanted everyone to have frogs, but for you to have lots of frogs, hence the self-mill restriction.
I wasn't sure how strong token-making could be. It's something that varies and is always stronger than it looks. It seems to vary between Breeding Pit (4CMC ench 0/1 every turn) to Creakwood Liege (4CMC, 2/2, 3/3 every turn, upside). I'm worried 0/2s will be too annoying to attack through, but OTOH, you can usually attack into them safely.
For Challenge # 032 L5R flavour text.
I've been wanting an excuse to use 'gain an advantage, and later I fight you' for a while.
For Challenge # 032, and because of the horrible seal pun potential.
For myself, Plague of Frogs.
It can be a creature or tribal card, but doesn't have to be: Turn to Frog is an excellent example. Feel free to interpret the challenge loosely: I'm thinking of "nice cards with a slightly goofy flavour", but goofy non-aquatic creatures or non-goofy aquatic creatures are fine if you want.
On the planeswalker frame: I know I've chosen not to make a card use loyalty because I would need to add the word 'Planeswalker' to do it. There's probably a lot more misses than just Jack and Bosses. As it is, many non-Magic designs that I've been working on (that aren't public yet) would like the Planeswalker frame...
Forget Rootgrapple, just play 2 of these in a row.
to draw 14 cards should be in line with mythic, right?
On defeat: Yeah, that's what I was assuming. I don't think the card needs to spell out the rules any more than planeswalker cards do.
On frames: Yeah, that's a reasonable idea. There wasn't much call for it at first, but between these bosses and JackV's loyalty lands, I ought to get around to it.
The planeswalker frame has most in common with the token frame, actually, and perhaps I ought to allow that on cards that don't have the token rarity too.
Would it be possible for the planeswalker frame to be moved to the frames dropdown ? or possibly just code it to activate for either Planeswalker OR boss?
Also with regards to defeating a boss, that could be covered in the rules rather than on card - much like attacking/assigning damage to a planeswalker. Rules could say something like - a Boss is only defeated when its last loyalty? counter is removed due to damage???
For Challenge # 031. These are awesome. I think they'd need to be ruled to only pay off if destroyed via damage, as otherwise this makes a simple Rootgrapple a bit too good.