Multiverse Design Challenge: Recent Activity
| Multiverse Design Challenge: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| All challenges | Upcoming Challenges | Make a new design challenge! | All challenges (text) |
Recent updates to Multiverse Design Challenge: (Generated at 2025-05-24 06:14:40)
(Fwying cweatures can only be bwocked by other fwying cweatures, and people named woss with weach. Wuckily, bwocking has no effect other than sounding like a chicken.)
insert typo, as reqwested :)
Huh. Funky effect. Pity there are so few things to trigger it off: Firewild Borderpost/Wildfield Borderpost, Mage Slayer/Behemoth Sledge, Birthing Pod/Thundering Tanadon, and things affected by Painter's Servant/Shifting Sky/Mycosynth Lattice.
But, hey, that's enough to build a strange casual theme deck around, and it taps for 2 or 3 mana a turn if you do. I'd play it. :)
Edit: Okay, that was from memory; checking with a search engine, there are actually 9.
Is it meant to have "Fwying"? :) (The only time this decade I've played Duck, Duck, Goose was with a 3-year-old and a 2-year-old.)
Nifty.
Draconian Magistrate. I could have resisted, but I didn't.
Next: Appropriate Measure (You control target measure...)
For Challenge # 049; channelling royal assassin more than anything.
Mainly, the flavour text (Inspired by "Duck. Duck. duck. GOOSE! {fwoosh}", clearly) was a gimme, and the mechanics went from there.
Naga Ascendant.
Next: [Draconian Magistrate]
For Challenge # 049, based on the Saviors of Kamigawa cycle.
Also, makes me think this should be a "Silicone" golem ;)
Hee. Modular but working on anything, not just artifact creatures. Looks like a good keyword. Scarier than modular also in that it keeps increasing as you chain it between creatures (unless the thing was killed by a -X/-X effect or a creature with infect or wither).
add type
Grove of Emeralds
Next: [Naga Ascendant]
Challenge # 049
Silicon Golem
Next: [Grove of Emeralds]
For Challenge # 049.
@SM: Yeah, I think a two-card combo for an indestructible creature is fine :)
I don't know whether I agree with wizards' philosophy of rarity, but I generally design cards trying to roughly approximate it except when I say otherwise. And I think the guidelines would say that 3C 3/3 flier at common is too dominating of the limited environment. But that at rare a 4C 4/4 indestructible flier is about right.
In fact, it should probably be 3UU. Possibly it should be mythic, but it didn't seem "wow" enough for that.
SM's idea is amusing. It does just boil down to a Dawn Elemental or Darksteel Gargoyle though.
As for costing, I'd say it's fine at rare. Blue gets 5/5 flyers for 6 all the time at rare; and at uncommon, Air Elemental is pretty frequent and pretty unplayable in Constructed (still jolly good in Limited though).
It does seem pretty cheap. Blue isn't even allowed to have a 3/3 flyer for
. Is it allowed a 4/4 nearly-invulnerable for 
?
Apart from that, yeah, the basic concept is fine.
This plus Wheel of Sun and Moon is pretty funny, but amazingly not that broken. It's a lot more intensive than Dawn Elemental, for sure.
Oh, good point. Yeah, that's a very similar idea, but not one I remembered. But I think being on a creature is sufficiently different.
I think if it's preventing damage to you, exile makes sense since (a) if you can recur your library, it's more of an "I win" and (b) more damage is probably dealt to you than to one creature, so you're more likely to run out.
Presumably that would be lovely in a battle of wits deck :)
Perhaps you were thinking of Thought Lash? That is a very powerful card... but this isn't that, so direct comparisons are useless. I do think it interesting, though, that the Alliances team decided to use exile. That seems appropriate... as it stands, this card requires approximately 35 total damage to die, and the entire time it's giving you an excellent bonus ability. I'm quite sure people could pass valid arguments as to why I'm wrong, though.