Deliverance: Recent Activity
Deliverance: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Mechanics | The Unity Pact | Skeleton |
Recent updates to Deliverance: (Generated at 2024-05-02 17:33:54)
Deliverance: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Mechanics | The Unity Pact | Skeleton |
Recent updates to Deliverance: (Generated at 2024-05-02 17:33:54)
thanks
Ah yes, fair enough. (I fixed your link for you :) )
Because Dark Omens has the card Icthyomancy, I decided to add one of the guys that casts it into this set. It makes it a fish because it is Merfolk Magic and whilst there are some aquatic snakes, there are many more fish.
Seems overcosted. Compare with Writ of Passage, or indeed Cloak of Mists.
Hmm, Serendib Sorcerer meets Omnibian, with a smattering of... I can't think of any repeatable "target creature loses all abilities" card apart from Soul Sculptor, so I guess this is quite a nifty design. I might think Snake would make more sense than Fish, given that this guy basically casts Snakeform.
That's quite nice.
How about this version ?
It could probably be a 2/3 without any other change
Feels somewhat unsatisfying cost, but it is significantly better than Humble Budoka so you probably do need the third mana.
Like a simplified Timber Protector. Except much worse. Knock a mana off his cost and you've got a reasonable rare, though often still irrelevant.
Good common design.
Comparison to Baneslayer Angel is not a valid reference point! Baneslayer was ludicrously pushed, mythic, hugely expensive in cash terms, and format-defining in multiple ways. You do not want to use Baneslayer as a baseline for your power levels!
This is certainly fine as a rare rather than an uncommon. I wasn't worried so much about its attacking strength as its power as a blocker. If this is untapped, it can easily deter an X/7 from attacking, and probably even an X/9. That's fine on a rare, but might have been a bit much on an uncommon.