Envertol: Life's a Gamble: Recent Activity
Envertol: Life's a Gamble: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Mechanics | Skeleton |
Recent updates to Envertol: Life's a Gamble: (Generated at 2025-07-04 16:24:53)
"Return target" to 'Return another target"
Seems like you couldn't decide whether just Good Thinking Minime or all creatures you control should get the boost.
Seems like you came up with a bargain variant for this. :)
I actually don't remember. "
,
, or
" at a cost seems unconditionally bad to the point I don't think entering untapped offers any worthwhile trade-off.
Text costs go after symbols:
Is "
,
,
" supposed to mean "

" or "
,
or
"? That might influence how one feels about ETBT on this.
Curious about the trigger condition being sacrifice rather than any death. I suppose the set makes sacrifice extremely likely?
If this can't chain that becomes even weirder, because you remove the one guaranteed source of sacrifice the set has from the equation.
I don't see a problem with allowing chains since this is an Aura and will disappear with the removal of the creature. Even on a global enchantment you are capped by wiping the board and this is not that.
The board complexity might be an issue, but OTOH an opponent activating a sacrifice outlet in reaction to this triggering to avoid the effect wouldn't feel good.
I'm voting against the caveat. If this promotes passive play in Limited play tests, I'd move it to uncommon rather than adding a caveat.
Seems fine.
I'd prefer a static number of Treasures e. g. Most Wanted, but on an uncommon you can have this kind of effect that occasionally over-performs.
I think, the effect of the triggered ability is missing a verb.