I have no intention of the check appearing on a high number of cards to warrant a name for the ability. This card was loosely created to pair with Sinkwhirl Serpent. I guess I could decrease the check from 10 to 7 though.
Yeah, threshold. (7 is enough) But if you're in a set with only one instance of it, better to spell it out than bring back the keyword for a single card.
20 is also a very high number; but it looks like a life total, so probably gets a pass on that.
2019-01-23 00:25:50:
Sorrow
created and commented on the card Survivor
Considered 27 after averaging the number of participants in Battle Royale, The Hunger Games, and Avengers Arena, but that seemed like too high a number.
Now checks for 7 instead of 10.
Checks for 7 instead of 10 now
I have no intention of the check appearing on a high number of cards to warrant a name for the ability. This card was loosely created to pair with Sinkwhirl Serpent. I guess I could decrease the check from 10 to 7 though.
Sinkwhirl Serpent has the mechanic as well. The theme might grow now that it's been introduced 88 cards into the set's vision design.
Anyway, I came here to suggest changing the value to 7 whether the ability word would be used or not. :)
Yeah, threshold. (7 is enough) But if you're in a set with only one instance of it, better to spell it out than bring back the keyword for a single card.
Threshold?
Debating on changing this to exiling target permanent with CMC 4 or greater. This would be white to getting planeswalker removal though.
Realized I never gave this card a creature type
Replaced vigilance with first strike
Survivor sounds more like the name of a token than an aura. Why does it grant the abilities to the creature, rather than doing them itself?
20 is also a very high number; but it looks like a life total, so probably gets a pass on that.
Considered 27 after averaging the number of participants in Battle Royale, The Hunger Games, and Avengers Arena, but that seemed like too high a number.
Vigilance doesn't seem useful here.