biolgica for now is self-contained (i'll add some flavor for that once i start redeveloping), but sometime in the future i may have a sort of biotic moon thing going on with a crossover between this and another plane
Oh, yeah, I get the biological, but also artifacts part and think it's a cool way to take it. But I'm interested in the flavor of this plane ant this could just as well have been an extraplanar invader/viral infection - which honestly would be an equally cool idea.
Yes they are like neurons. But the biology on this plane takes as many forms as i let it (w/o breaking mtg rules)... so these are biological, but also artificial: also half-living artifacts aren't that new (ie phyrexia)
imagine this as a little fleshy robot that is like a cyborg. But you might be right, i should definitely set some hard boundaries on what role artifacts will play in this set once i get back to it
I like the base concept of this card, but between rarity and efficiency of the effect I still feel it's a bit out there. I feel it would be better as e. g. a 1/1, but with an added to the activation cost - you still get at least two activations out of assembling a pair which seems still like it would be overpowered, but not having any safety valve seems concerning.
I see there are more Logicon cards. I wonder whether their concept is to be like Neurons or whether being artifact creatures implies they are separate from the "biology" of this plane.
I like the creature type it currently has: Devil. It's been historically black as well as red and is whimsical enough to fit the flavor of an annoying thing that propagates and gets out of hand.
On another note this could be cheaper again with the new functionality. Since you now are more restricted in creating additional copies and pay a real cost, you could easily slash that mana cost in half.
Btw: It's not the text that affects only Constructed though that's causing you to want this at a lower rarity. It's the text that makes multiples play better together. Correct conclusion, but from the wrong premise.
I think it needs to be rare (if pumps everyone )or uncommon (if pumps itself, which I think i'll go for...), but i dont like how much you changed the card with that idea... so i probably will do something difffernet.
Also: """There is no connection between "You may have any number of cards named Clotter in your deck" abilities and being common, because - Guess what! - rarity matters in Limited and you have no four-of restriction in Limited that I am aware of - you get as many as you open/draft."""
is something you said, and actually there kind of is, because yes, in limited there is no playset rule of 4, but you forget how more likely it is to get more of these at common rather than at rares! So yes, commons are easily the most abundant, and i think therefore have a link to the any number rule.
Hmm, i am gonna make it uncommon, pump itself, and yes, i think it will become a tokenmaker of self
to be clear, rather than this plane being invaded, it would be the kind of plane to be the invader.
you're right, this is sort of lame...
i might find something more inspired to do with this card, or take it out entirely. we'll see when i get back to this set
biolgica for now is self-contained (i'll add some flavor for that once i start redeveloping), but sometime in the future i may have a sort of biotic moon thing going on with a crossover between this and another plane
Oh, yeah, I get the biological, but also artifacts part and think it's a cool way to take it. But I'm interested in the flavor of this plane ant this could just as well have been an extraplanar invader/viral infection - which honestly would be an equally cool idea.
Probably the one time Pauper matters. Free 1/1s are probably not what you want in the format
fixd cost
I think it is strong but also not bahroken
could become taken advantage of tho. lots of decks wood run this.
added tap.
Yes they are like neurons. But the biology on this plane takes as many forms as i let it (w/o breaking mtg rules)... so these are biological, but also artificial: also half-living artifacts aren't that new (ie phyrexia)
imagine this as a little fleshy robot that is like a cyborg. But you might be right, i should definitely set some hard boundaries on what role artifacts will play in this set once i get back to it
Also kinda hard to bootstrap it :)
Does not seem worth including the only instance of in a cost for this card.
I want to say "strictly better than uncommon Memnite", but I also haven't found yet why this set should even have this card anyway.
I like the base concept of this card, but between rarity and efficiency of the effect I still feel it's a bit out there. I feel it would be better as e. g. a 1/1, but with an added to the activation cost - you still get at least two activations out of assembling a pair which seems still like it would be overpowered, but not having any safety valve seems concerning.
I see there are more Logicon cards. I wonder whether their concept is to be like Neurons or whether being artifact creatures implies they are separate from the "biology" of this plane.
good point, the mana cost can be halfed now!
Thanks all for your time and work with me on this card, only about 300 or so more to correct! xD
I like the creature type it currently has: Devil. It's been historically black as well as red and is whimsical enough to fit the flavor of an annoying thing that propagates and gets out of hand.
On another note this could be cheaper again with the new functionality. Since you now are more restricted in creating additional copies and pay a real cost, you could easily slash that mana cost in half.
Btw: It's not the text that affects only Constructed though that's causing you to want this at a lower rarity. It's the text that makes multiples play better together. Correct conclusion, but from the wrong premise.
i like this.
If you have things, please say, but i think ill keep it liket his.
But i need one more thing: what creature type to use???
I think it needs to be rare (if pumps everyone )or uncommon (if pumps itself, which I think i'll go for...), but i dont like how much you changed the card with that idea... so i probably will do something difffernet.
Also: """There is no connection between "You may have any number of cards named Clotter in your deck" abilities and being common, because - Guess what! - rarity matters in Limited and you have no four-of restriction in Limited that I am aware of - you get as many as you open/draft."""
is something you said, and actually there kind of is, because yes, in limited there is no playset rule of 4, but you forget how more likely it is to get more of these at common rather than at rares! So yes, commons are easily the most abundant, and i think therefore have a link to the any number rule.
Hmm, i am gonna make it uncommon, pump itself, and yes, i think it will become a tokenmaker of self