Multiverse Feedback: Recent Activity
| Multiverse Feedback: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Upcoming releases | Skeleton |
Recent updates to Multiverse Feedback: (Generated at 2025-07-01 21:09:52)
There's a reasonable chance you'll get this in the next update, that's also bringing scheme/plane/vanguard frames and allowing nonPlaneswalkers to have the loyalty frame.
Yikes. Did I really forget to let changes to the skeleton expire the cached version of the skeleton?? Thanks for clarifying. I feel rather silly.
In the meantime you can work around it the same way: edit any card and save it, and then take another look at the skeleton.
But blarg. I'll look into this in more detail and try to get a fix rolled out very soon.
I just really want them for my Arena set. Pretty please? :D
Cool. :)
Okay, got the cache and code things. Thanks.
The skeleton issues is like this (I tried this making a new set):
-I created Terramorphic Expanse with code CL01.
-I generated the skeleton to have five common land slots.
-The skeleton looks like this:
-I created Evolving Wilds with code CL02
-The skeleton looks the same (the link for CL02 doesn't show Evolving Wilds and if I click it makes me create a new card, even though the "skeleton row" shows "CL02 Evolving Wilds".
-If I try to edit anything in the skeleton, including filling the "slot" or "notes" fields or removing/including some rows, when I update it, it still looks the same.
So, basically, once I generate the skeleton, I can't change anything about it. I mean when I view it, because if I try to edit it, it has the changes I made.
Funny thing is I'd used the skeleton before and I'd had no problems. :/
Hmm. There is somewhat of a fuzzy spectrum between tags, rulings, design notes and comments. But yes, I could do something along these lines.
FWIW, this can be worked around by editing any random card in the cardset then clicking save (you don't need to make any changes). That blanks the cache so the new view from the front page should be up-to-date. I do plan to fix this soon though.
Ah... if "it still showed up" means in the grey cardset links box, but clicking it said it didn't exist, then this is a duplicate of Caching a bit too much. And it can be worked around by editing any random card in the cardset (I think you don't even have to make a change, just click Edit then Save).
What do you mean by "it looks exactly the same"? Could you clarify precisely what steps you took, what behaviour you expected, and what behaviour you saw?
BTW, if this is relating to your current private cardset, I'm afraid the site currently assumes card codes will be precisely two letters followed by one or more digits. Code L20 won't work - you'll need to use RL20 or CL20.
Caching makes slime trails even harder to lay.
At first I just reported that I'd made a skeleton, deleted it, and it still showed up but I couldn't access it. And I couldn't make a new one. This still happens, but the major issue is that I can't make a skeleton work. :(
Sure. Tags in comments is a little messier (and a bit confusing if you add tags at different times), and you have to wait until you make the card to comment.
If tags aren't sensible, a field for card comments (a single field that can be changed and always appears under the card, for example) should do it. Might also fix the problem people have with trying to make card rulings?
You're right, the skeleton rows are indeed not directly bound to cards. If you change a card's code, that will move the card from one skeleton slot to another. So in that sense it's independent of cards.
Yes, it'll be hard for invertebrates to use Multiverse.
If that's not what you meant, then I don't know what you did mean...
But isn't information on the skeleton indepent of the cards themselves? Or am I using it wrong?
Yeah, I think the skeleton is probably a reasonable place for this; or there's nothing to stop you inventing a tag ("AVRLonerTheme") that you mention in comments and look for with the advanced search page. When I rework skeleton/cardlist to combine them I'll see if I can find a way to allow this, but I don't think it's really sensible to add some specific field to cards for "tags".
Skeleton? Comments?
What would you want such "tagging" to do? Just link to their user page? I assume not. Send them a notification that you'd mentioned them? But in most cases I'm expecting people will subscribe to discussion threads they post in anyway.
To clarify: (((dude1818))) becomes dude1818.
Bookmarking this page. Thanks for the heads up.
Even if I haven't been using the site long, I agree with disabling parens. I always end up using that (?) mana symbol, especially since I overuse question marks. :)
Looking at the database, it seems like about 3/4 of the time when people use (.) in comments, they're not using it as a mana symbol, but in lists like (a), (.b), (.c) or (.1), (.2), (.3); optional plurals like colour(.s); or expressing uncertainty (.?). So I think I should disable paren-matching for mana symbols entirely in comments, and require people to use braces in comments.
The reason why I allowed parens in the first place is because I think many people find them easier to type than brace.
I only use { and }.
Hmmm. I usually use braces/squigglebrackets, but I think people probably do use parentheses from time to time. I'll do a database query and find out what people have actually used.