Community Set: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity
Mechanics | Skeleton | Common Breakdown Ref | All commons for playtesting

CardName: Lumbering Mycoshamble Cost: GG Type: Creature - Fungus Pow/Tgh: 3/4 Rules Text: When Lumbering Mycoshamble comes into play, put a +1/+1 counter on target creature an opponent controls. Flavour Text: Set/Rarity: Community Set Uncommon

Lumbering Mycoshamble
{g}{g}
 
 U 
Creature – Fungus
When Lumbering Mycoshamble comes into play, put a +1/+1 counter on target creature an opponent controls.
3/4
Expand text
Updated on 19 Mar 2014 by jmgariepy

Code: UG01

Active?: true

History: [-]

2011-08-26 13:00:14: Jack V created the card Lumbering Mycoshamble
on 26 Aug 2011 by rourke:

I love this. I can see it being 4/3 though.

on 26 Aug 2011 by rourke:

Never mind. The counter will be easier to track if P=T, and if +1/+1 for the other guy is good sometimes, this gets that much better.

on 26 Aug 2011 by Alex:

I think this is good as it is. I don't think I'd want to see a 2-drop any bigger than this even with a drawback. (Heh, Sheltering Ancient is actually an interesting comparison.)

2012-01-25 06:17:56: jmgariepy edited Lumbering Mycoshamble
on 25 Jan 2012 by jmgariepy:

We may want to remove the "without a +1/+1 counter" line. I think it hearkens back to previous conversations that don't mean as much now that this mechanic has been diminished.

on 25 Jan 2012 by Alex:

Yes, I agree it'd be worth simplifying that.

on 26 Jan 2012 by jmgariepy:

That's good enough for me.

2012-01-26 05:05:29: jmgariepy edited Lumbering Mycoshamble
on 14 Mar 2014 by Alex:

This claims to be active, but its code is nonstandard , and there's a card in the slot this is trying to have (CG01 Simple Fungus).

2014-03-19 01:50:02: jmgariepy edited Lumbering Mycoshamble
on 19 Mar 2014 by jmgariepy:

Well that's annoying, but I have an answer. Welcome to the uncommon sheet. The risk/reward nature of the card belongs in that commonality anyway. Since Uncommon is supposed to be 'better' than common, I took the opportunity to give it an extra toughness, too.

Only signed-in users are permitted to comment on this cardset. Would you like to sign in?