| Logic: the Processing: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Foreword |
|
CardName: Site Cost: Type: Land - Site Pow/Tgh: / Rules Text: {T}: Generate {c}. Reform {5}{w}{w}{w} (You may cast the back face of this card by paying its reform cost.) Flavour Text: Back side: CardName: Sororize Cost: Type: Enchantment Pow/Tgh: / Rules Text: At the beginning of your upkeep, create a 3/3 white Angel creature token with flying. Flavour Text: Set/Rarity: Logic: the Processing Uncommon |
History: [-] |
: Generate 
.
Enchantment
As an experience from Pyrulea you probably want the land to be on the back - it's really simple and easier to grasp and having the mana cost on the site that needs to be paid helps as well.
At least in a vacuum.
More generally, I am a big fan of landmorph (morph, but the face-down card is redefined to be a colorless mana producing land).
Lands have no cost. So how would you spell out the reform cost?
IT would be a casting cosrt as normal, for the enchantment front side. With text "You may play this transformed as a land" or similar.
I agree it's much more natural that way around.
The land side is going to be played much more often. And the sequence you'll think about during a game.
You should bring that up with WotC concerning Emeria's Call.
well what's your own experience? do you play them in sleeves? how often do you think about casting the 7 or 8cc side? if you drew two or three in opening hand, how often is spell side played first?