| Pyrulea: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | More Detail on The Set | Skeleton | Color Archetypes | Creative/World Building | Cycles |
|
CardName: Twilight Settlement Cost: Type: Land Pow/Tgh: / Rules Text: Twilight Settlement enters the battlefield tapped. {T}: Add {W} or {B} to your mana pool. Cycling {W}{B} Flavour Text: The sun reaches far enough through the canopy to touch the Oltac rope bridges, but not to drive back all the shadows. Set/Rarity: Pyrulea Common |
Code: Active?: false History: [-] Add your comments: |
: Add 
or 
to your mana pool.
The Bank Entrance cycle looks a little complex to me, so I've brainstormed this to have something else in reserve.
added rarity
Im confused by this new cycle though. Isn't this inherently OP by precedent even without the cyling, to have common dual lands with no downside?
Added ETBT clause.
Addressed.
Is Pyrulea a multicolor set (I haven't been tracking the MTGS thread at all)? I'm not sure this sort of cycle needs to be at common. It seems like a fine fit at uncommon or even rare.
(unless of course the rarity just hasn't been set properly, in which case ignore this comment ^_^;;;)
It's not a multicolor set really. But there are two color archetypes that these color combinations cover.
The rarity is set at common because I designed them as possible replacements for the cycle of common (dual) lands that are already in the set.
I have no strong preference either way (common or uncommon) but experience tells me that custom sets generally benefit from a more loose approach to low-rarity dual lands than exercised by WotC.
Hi, Irrigated Farmland cycle. :)