Pyrulea: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Mechanics | More Detail on The Set | Skeleton | Color Archetypes | Creative/World Building | Cycles |
CardName: Terrible Journey Cost: 2B Type: Sorcery Pow/Tgh: / Rules Text: Target creature gets -X/-X until end of turn, where X is your Discovery. (Your discovery is equal to the number of lands you control with different names) Flavour Text: Set/Rarity: Pyrulea Common |
Code: Active?: false History: [-] Add your comments: |
Contesting slot CB15 Asphyxiate. See also Card74934.
I can see this as a possible alternative, though it gives a creature destruction slot to off-color Discovery and is less of a straight removal card than Asphyxiate.
Well, Downfall is straight removal at common already - so I thought replacing one with -N/-N would add some variance (also this is a premier spot to actually use discovery as a dynamic threshold as opposed to the static "if your discovery is three or more").
I guess my reasoning for still wanting Asphyxiate is that it's in the realm of "relatively cost-effective removal", while Downfall isn't. I like downfall as a land destruction variant for black, but it's not an example of cost-effective creature destruction at 5 CMC. So to me there's a need for both cards. This card can sort of substitute for a cheaper creature removal, but that space being taken by an off-color Discovery card doesn't appeal to me. I figure black should be able to get a cost-effective creature removal option without having to use Discovery.
Well, this can be cost more efficiently. I just went into this thinking we should leave room for another straightforward removal spell at uncommon.
I definitely prefer this to Card74934.