Pyrulea: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity
Mechanics | More Detail on The Set | Skeleton | Color Archetypes | Creative/World Building | Cycles

CardName: Vengeance of the Sun Cost: 2R Type: Enchantment Pow/Tgh: / Rules Text: Whenever your Discovery increases, Vengeance of the Sun deals 2 damage to target creature or player. (Your discovery is equal to the number of lands you control with different names.) Flavour Text: Set/Rarity: Pyrulea Uncommon

Vengeance of the Sun
{2}{r}
 
 U 
Enchantment
Whenever your Discovery increases, Vengeance of the Sun deals 2 damage to target creature or player. (Your discovery is equal to the number of lands you control with different names.)
Updated on 11 Jan 2017 by TRicher

Code: UR14

Active?: true

History: [-]

2016-10-12 00:57:37: Brainpolice created the card Vengeance of the Sun

Still playing around with this, could be better as a rare. Could go on a creature instead. Could just deal 1 damage to each opponent. General concept though is: Red card that uses Discovery as a trigger for direct damage.

2016-10-12 00:58:05: Brainpolice edited Vengeance of the Sun

This could cost {2}{r}, compare Burning Vengeance. Would be a nice reference to that card, which has a lot of fans, as well.

2016-10-12 01:21:22: Brainpolice edited Vengeance of the Sun

Gave it a name and upped it to 3 CMC.

2016-10-12 01:43:39: Brainpolice edited Vengeance of the Sun
2016-10-18 07:07:01: Brainpolice edited Vengeance of the Sun:

Editing Discovery rules text to show properly.

2016-11-23 05:48:37: TRicher edited Vengeance of the Sun:

Added to skeleton

­Firecaller Mage remains justified only if we don't obsolete it with "discovery-fall".

I'm already kind of biased in favor of "discovery-fall" over unnamed landfall.

I dont see why both cant exist in the same set. Both encourge playing more lands, one is just more generic for less payoff.

I would prefer this to be on a creature tbh, this just feels like it'll either do too much or too little (not being able to increase your discovery vs being able to). Putting this effect on a body would make it feel less bad in the situations where you cant increase you discovery.

This looks to me like it should be an enchantment, as it's the standard "red uncommon enchantment that gives you bonus damage when you do the set's thing". Burning Vengeance was one of those, but there's also Furnace Celebration, Molten Nursery, Rumbling Aftershocks, Vigilante Justice, Knowledge and Power, Lightning Rift, Rage Extractor...

Isn't it an enchantment already? Did someone edit it without it being shown here that it was edited?

This is an enchantment already. Some people are saying it should change to being a creature. I'm disagreeing, saying it should stay an enchantment.

Ah sorry, didn't read the post right above yours.

Add your comments:


(formatting help)
Enter mana symbols like this: {2}{U}{U/R}{PR}, {T} becomes {2}{u}{u/r}{pr}, {t}
You can use Markdown such as _italic_, **bold**, ## headings ##
Link to [[[Official Magic card]]] or (((Card in Multiverse)))
Include [[image of official card]] or ((image or mockup of card in Multiverse))
Make hyperlinks like this: [text to show](destination url)
How much damage does this card deal? Shock
(Signed-in users don't get captchas and can edit their comments)