Oooh, this is a fun wild card. The name feels a little generic though, and I don't think that instant and sorcery are capitalized.

I checked, and you are correct that they should not be capitalized.

And yeah, the name's basically a place-holder. If you think you have a better name feel free to change it.

Huh. Wouldn't this just be a counterspell+ assuming you were mono-red? It wouldn't be as good as either Dispel or Envelop, but I wouldn't be surprised to see a blue common in the next set read "Counter target instant or sorcery" for .

Well it only hits instants and sorceries, and lets them blow up one of your lands, so I wouldn't call it "Counterspell +" by any means.

I'll admit though that it was part of an experiment on my part to make Blue-less counterspells that felt in-color. This was the only one I made that didn't feel like it needed to have blue in its cost, though.

If you're playing no non-basic lands (an easy feat for mono-red) this counters an opponents spell and potentially destroys that players own non-basic land (since his or her lands are the only targets, and they must target.) Since the restriction of not playing any non-basics is easy to commit to, that's a counter+ in my book.

To put it another way, if I was playing 85% of the decks in the current environment, I would prefer this spell both countered my instant or sorcery and deal four damage to me. The loss of a non-basic land on round 2 is devastating for a control opponent trying to fight back against a relentless red deck.