Multiverse: Demagogue

Mechanics | Skeleton | Storyline | Limited Archetypes | Creature Types

Mockup
Plain

CardName: Demagogue Cost: W Type: Creature - Human Advisor Pow/Tgh: 1/1 Rules Text: It is against the law for opponents to attack with exactly one creature. *Justice* — At the beginning of your upkeep, if an opponent broke the law since the beginning of your last turn, you may pay {1}. If you do, create a 1/1 colorless Thopter artifact creature token with flying. Flavour Text: Set/Rarity: Tesla Project Uncommon

Demagogue

Creature – Human Advisor

It is against the law for opponents to attack with exactly one creature.
Justice — At the beginning of your upkeep, if an opponent broke the law since the beginning of your last turn, you may pay {1}

. If you do, create a 1/1 colorless Thopter artifact creature token with flying.

1/1

Updated on 26 Jul 2016 by Inanimate

Code:

History: [-]

by Inanimate:

Brainstormed Laws:

Casting a spell that targets a creature you control is against the law.
Casting spells during combat is against the law.
Casting two or more spells a turn is against the law.
Casting no spells is against the law.
Blocking creatures you control is against the law.
Transforming a permanent is against the law.
Activated an ability of an artifact or creature is against the law.

2015-11-04 12:46:13: Circeus edited Demagogue

2015-11-06 12:17:56: Doombringer edited Demagogue:

now tracked by the mechanics page

2015-11-13 01:39:58: Doombringer edited Demagogue:

changed to new Justice wording

2015-11-30 10:01:41: Alex edited Demagogue:

Thopter tokens are artifacts

by Inanimate:

This is too long for common, is it not?

by CasualR:

Likely. considering that there is one with this effect at uncommon in blue.

Production Foreman

by Doombringer:

yes this card isn't common

by Doombringer:

This card needs a rework using the new laws etc.

2016-01-15 18:14:47: Inanimate edited Demagogue:

Now uncommon. Now has a law.

by Alex:

I said on the Goblin Artisans thread that I definitely don't want the same law on all commons, or even the same law on all commons of the same colour. But I'm completely fine with repeating laws within a colour as long as there are at least two or three different ones at common. So I think this looks good.

It might be worth trying to find some common part of the card name that all the "attack with multiple creatures" lawmakers can have, to help opponents remember more easily what they have to avoid doing.

2016-07-26 18:44:31: Inanimate edited Demagogue

Add your comments: