CardName: Twin-Axe Warrior
Cost: {R}{W}
Type: Creature - Human Warrior
Pow/Tgh: 2/1
Rules Text: Whenever Twin-Axe Warrior or another Warrior enters the
battlefield, you may pay {1}{R/W}. If you do, target
creature you control gains doublstreike until end of turn.
Flavour Text:
Set/Rarity: Washikow Uncommon
Twin-Axe Warrior
U
Creature – Human Warrior
Whenever Twin-Axe Warrior or another Warrior enters the battlefield, you may pay . If you do, target creature you control gains doublstreike until end of turn.
Ngl, I don't remember. Obviously it wants to primarily play with Warriors, but for the general health of the game and the fact that some cards in this set were designed to work with multiple creature types, it's probably fine as it currently is. Like, worst-case is you're paying four mana, three of which is to give something doublestrike the turn it comes out- even with a body, that's not great, since you're on two colors for a 2/1 and 2 mana to give something doublestrike. Otherwise, you're probably playing Warriors with maybe something big like an Angel or Dragon to finish, but that kind of play-style sounds normal for Magic?
Was this intended to be any creature gets double strike? Or target warrior gets doublestrike
Ngl, I don't remember. Obviously it wants to primarily play with Warriors, but for the general health of the game and the fact that some cards in this set were designed to work with multiple creature types, it's probably fine as it currently is. Like, worst-case is you're paying four mana, three of which is to give something doublestrike the turn it comes out- even with a body, that's not great, since you're on two colors for a 2/1 and 2 mana to give something doublestrike. Otherwise, you're probably playing Warriors with maybe something big like an Angel or Dragon to finish, but that kind of play-style sounds normal for Magic?