| Community Set: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Skeleton | Common Breakdown Ref | All commons for playtesting |
|
CardName: Reckless School Cost: 2 Type: Artifact - Fortification Pow/Tgh: / Rules Text: Fortify {2} Fortified land has "{T}: Reveal the top card of your library. If that's a color this land could produce mana of, put it into your hand and discard a card." Flavour Text: Set/Rarity: Community Set Common |
Code: Active?: false History: [-] |
: Reveal the top card of your library. If that's a color this land could produce mana of, put it into your hand and discard a card."
I don't like this effect, but keying off the colours of mana the land could produce would be another way to make "which land" matter.
I like the idea that the mana it can produce matters.
I like the family of ideas, certainly.
It seems that a lot of us like this concept, but the execution is questionable. Want to take another stab, Jack? If you can tie a common ability into this nicely, this will probably be CA08.
I assume Jack missed my comment in my last update. There was a lot of techincal mumbo jumbo in there. None the less, I'd like to move this on, and have one card that cared about the color of mana the land produces.
That being said, I know that this is a borderline useless application of this in Aer... if we're going with the 'all basic lands' model, why not just ask for the land type? I like the idea of having a one of just to say that we spotted this application and for further applications in other blocks (oh, and it also works with blue flooding (kind-a) and the fortification that turns your land into ever land), but I can't help but figure that Wizards would probably just hold the mechanic until it was more appropriate.
Ug. I think I just talked myself out of it.