Code Geass: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity
Mechanics | Introduction and General Invitation | Proxies for playtest | Design Challenge 2 | Colour-pair archetypes | Skeleton

CardName: Underwater Mine Cost: 1 Type: Artifact Pow/Tgh: / Rules Text: {2}, Sacrifice Underwater Mine: It deals 3 damage to target attacking creature. Flavour Text: Set/Rarity: Code Geass Common

Underwater Mine
{1}
 
 C 
Artifact
{2}, Sacrifice Underwater Mine: It deals 3 damage to target attacking creature.
Updated on 27 Jan 2021 by Alex

Code: CA02

Active?: true

History: [-]

2021-01-25 00:58:33: Alex created and commented on the card Underwater Mine

Episode 13 features underwater mines, and I've been thinking I'd like to use them as one of my common artifacts. The name "Underwater Mine" really suggests damage to attackers, but also suggests it really wants a {u} symbol somewhere on the card. I've been through quite a few potential designs before finally concluding this is a good way to do it.

The result is a version of Impeccable Timing with the significant drawback that it's telegraphed in advance, but the upside that if you can rustle up a blue mana from somewhere then it becomes a cantrip.

It also triggers revolt in decks including red or green as well as white, but Land Mine is more directly designed for that use case.

2021-01-27 17:54:45: Alex edited Underwater Mine:

As discussed on Land Mine: this card wants to be accessible to the (Red-green archetype), so remove the colour-specificity. Was 3-to-attacker if {w} spent, draw a card if {u} spent.

Land Mine didn't have any good designs mirroring the Repel Intruders-style design here, so I removed the coloured mana, making this more like Scalding Cauldron.

I considered adding back in some {u} to this card to play up the underwater-ness. But that runs into a weird issue. Imagine the following cards:

  • A 1/1 Merfolk creature, costing {u}, with "{2}, Sacrifice ~: ~ deals 3 damage to target attacking creature". That's a flagrant colour pie violation, on par with Psionic Blast.
  • A noncreature artifact, costing {u}, with the same ability. Like Witching Well but zapping an attacker. That's still clearly way out of pie for a blue card.
  • A noncreature artifact, costing {1}, with the same ability. That's perfectly fine in the colour pie, with plenty of precedent, from Aeolipile to Moonglove Extract to Springjaw Trap.

I was considering making this have a first line of text saying "When ~ ETBs, if {u} was spent to cast it, draw a card." But that I think makes this feel enough like a blue-coloured card that the activated ability feels out of pie.

This isn't an exact science, but I think it's better to leave this as it is. But it's interesting!

Add your comments:


(formatting help)
Enter mana symbols like this: {2}{U}{U/R}{PR}, {T} becomes {2}{u}{u/r}{pr}, {t}
You can use Markdown such as _italic_, **bold**, ## headings ##
Link to [[[Official Magic card]]] or (((Card in Multiverse)))
Include [[image of official card]] or ((image or mockup of card in Multiverse))
Make hyperlinks like this: [text to show](destination url)
How much damage does this card deal? Shock
(Signed-in users don't get captchas and can edit their comments)