Various Fandoms: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Mechanics |
History: [-] Add your comments: |
Various Fandoms: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Mechanics |
History: [-] Add your comments: |
Exactly 3? Or at least 3?
5 is right out.
Exactly three.
And not 2, unless you then go to 3. ;)
Probably worth having in the set just for this, inevitable, conversation.
Not worth playing with though, I'd think. (I point out that any deck that actually ran this would be using it to get to four, however...)