Community Set: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Mechanics | Skeleton | Common Breakdown Ref | All commons for playtesting |
Code: Active?: false History: [-] |
Community Set: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Mechanics | Skeleton | Common Breakdown Ref | All commons for playtesting |
Code: Active?: false History: [-] |
Doesn't WotC ususally do

Sharer of Souls
Enchantment Creature
Other creatures you control get +1/+1.
1/1?
Yes. That's the point, to make it feel like an enchantment creature. What's more enchantmenty than not having toughness?
Also, Wizards doesn't usually do enchantment creatures. ;)
In most cases 'Lords' say "All other creatures" because people have a tendency to forget to count the Lord anyhow. In this case, I think people would have a hard time forgetting to count the Sharer of Souls. If we changed its p/t to anything else, though, I think we'd have to go with "all other".
I like it, very alien feeling, I can just see what craziness xcan happen with four of these in play - 16/16 P/T for 8x
? Yes Please!
Er, four of these would just all be 4/4s. If it's only affecting copies of itself then it's inferior to Wizened Cenn. But it's a lot more versatile than the Cenn, obviously.
I really like this design. Its deliberate disconcertingness works very well: classless creature, 0/0, uncommon Glorious Anthem effect like on Kabira Vindicator. Nice one.
I think Camruth meant there would be 16 total power and toughness.
D'oh. Yes, of course.