EDH - BGW by UncleIstvan

69 cards in Multiverse

2 commons, 26 uncommons, 36 rares, 5 mythics

5 white, 12 black, 12 green,
26 multicolour, 6 artifact, 8 land

18 comments total

Custom EDH Deck #2

EDH - BGW: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity

Second in a new series of casual custom EDH decks. This one will focus on tokens, with possible minor themes of sacrificing and Saproling tribal.

General: Etan Orchardkeeper

Add a comment on this cardset

Recently active cards: (all recent activity)

Creature – Treefolk Shaman
{1}, {t}, Sacrifice a creature: Add {b}{g} to your mana pool.
last 2014-08-18 01:07:41 by UncleIstvan
Creature – Human Cleric
Whenever a creature enters the battlefield or dies, you gain 1 life.
Creature – Elf Monk
When Bolstersap Acolyte enters the battlefield, put a 1/1 green Saproling creature token onto the battlefield.

Saprolings you control get +1/+1.
Creature – Elemental
Soul of All's power and toughness are each equal to the number of permanents you control.
last 2014-07-25 18:09:06 by UncleIstvan
Creature – Beat
When Rot Tusker enters the battlefield, put a 1/1 green Saproling creature token onto the battlefield for each creature card among graveyards

Recent comments: (all recent activity)
On Bloodbowl Attendant:

Wow yeah, too many conditions on that mana. I thinkI'll get rid of the {1} in the activation cost, see how it works with just the sacrifice.

On Bloodbowl Attendant:

­Elves of Deep Shadow say this isn't completely unreasonable, but yeah, this card is low power. (Elves was one of the better cards... from the dark. So yeah, still low power even if you take that as your inspiration.)

On Bloodbowl Attendant:

Hm. I'd normally rather have Llanowar Dead by quite a long margin. I guess there are decks that really want sac outlets, especially in {g}{b}... but does this really need the {1} as well as the {t} and sac?

On Crumbling Terrace:

I think it'd be far too good with a "may". With "may" it'd be auto-include in every control deck that can handle the colourless. As it is it's interestingly risky.

On Crumbling Terrace:

agreed, but just from a rules adherence perspective this card will be difficult to police unless it's a may. very easy effect to forget about.

On Crumbling Terrace:

You're probably right, but I kind of like the riskiness. Also adding a may makes it much better and I am usually nervous about putting card draw on lands.

On Crumbling Terrace:

probably needs a may clause

On Duskglow Elk:
On Salvage Colossus:

Haha, yeah on my phone so I'm lucky if I can get a legible sentence out, thanks for the heads up.

On Salvage Colossus:

just housekeeping things:

  • i'm guessing this is meant to be an artifact creature?
  • the second sentence says counter instead of charge counter

otherwise cool card

(All recent activity)
See other cardsets