Ma'at Breached: Recent Activity
Ma'at Breached: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Mechanics | Skeleton |
Recent updates to Ma'at Breached: (Generated at 2025-05-09 14:36:03)
Ma'at Breached: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
Mechanics | Skeleton |
Recent updates to Ma'at Breached: (Generated at 2025-05-09 14:36:03)
Ah yes, the "rephrase it" approach. Sensible! Perhaps "Each [other] Shabti creature you control gets +1/+0 for each other Shabti you control."
probably, but it's been consistent in all three of my sets
Oh. Wow. Um.
That'll confuse a lot of players.
Singular - Shabti
Plural - Ushabti
"Ushabti" in the first ability - is that a separate creature type, or a typo for Shabti?
I would consider just making fracture something like "You may cast this spell for its fracture cost. If you do, cast the spell on the back of the card instead, then exile it as it resolves." This way, as long as the two cards have the same timing limitations, you're safe.
I'm assuming you mean this to be a flashback type of effect that exiles permanently. Currently you're exiling the card, then casting it from exile and putting it back in the graveyard, which seems to defeat the point.
hmmm, so maybe I should bump up the cost.
I don't really know. I got the template from Garruk, the Veil-Cursed
As I read it fracture has no timing limitation. Is that normal that Unexpected Night mare might be cast during the opponents turn?
If the back side is a black effect that can be cast for black mana, I think it should probably have a monoblack frame and colour indicator.
It similar comments when I made Drywater Well. I have to admit, it's probably too far on the strong side.
I made it so that blue and green shabti don't need artifact support. They do just as well without the WRB tribe