kauefr's cards: Recent Activity
| kauefr's cards: Cardlist | Visual spoiler | Export | Booster | Comments | Search | Recent activity |
| Mechanics | Color Pie Slices |
Recent updates to kauefr's cards: (Generated at 2024-04-25 07:34:02)
Page 1 - Older activity
Page 1 - Older activity
Sorcery speed
Triggered » Activated
Do I? I think the rules can handle the spell card returning to the stack and resolving normally.
You need to write out what happens to an exiled spell this way, c.f. spell queller
> However I'm lost as to what that "Egun token" is. Probably a Spirit
lol, yeah. This is a prospective mechanic for my Brasilia set, I forgot to explain it here.
Trying to find a color fixing land for my Jumpstart set.
Is this ok in a strictly 2-color environment? My hemi-decks will have 7 basics + one nonbasic land.
Black definitely gets deal with the devil style enchantments. However, I would expect them to have powerful effects and major drawbacks, e.g. Demonic Pact. Something little like this doesn't seem worth the design slot
A drawback on Saga, sure that sounds black.
However, this is just delayed, sorcery speed Infernal Grasp. Like, powerwise, it probably could be fine (running your own enchantment removal for this probably isn't worth the card slots). The question is how badly does the set want this over a Infernal Grasp or another similar removal spell.
I created contagion as a Aura version reverse living weapon, too. See Disfiguring Parasite.
However I'm lost as to what that "Egun token" is. Probably a Spirit. Needs reminder text at least,but in general creature tokens don't lend themselves to the predefined token treatment the same way noncreature tokens do.
Kind of a reverse "For Mirrodin!"
Buyback variant. Provides card advantage, specially in multiplayer games.
That is weird
A small experiment.
Actually it's the other way around. I came up with the mechanic first, I've been playing RDW on Arena and I wanted something to catch up on damage if you miss your 1-drop.
The name was then hastily chosen as a placeholder.
See Okk.
This creature can’t block unless a non-Spirit creature also blocks.
It's slightly functional different with shared turns, so anoter option is:
The difference is that the first wording allows it to attack as your only creature if a teammate attacks with a non-Spirit creature in a shared combat.
While "Spirit" can be used as a noun, "non-Spirit" is used as an adjective and would be paired with a noun.
Technically you might be able to remove the "also", and ten it would be able to attack alone if it somehow stops being a Spirit, but I suggest having it since it makes the intent clear IMO.
This creature cannot attack or block unless you also declare a non-spirit attacker or blocker